Official random bowls thread

aeromech said:
You couldn't be more wrong. The CFP Committee did this to them. If the playoff committee did this to us I would want us to do stuff like taking a knee on first down and punting on 3rd down.
Click to expand...

They got screwed for sure but they still had a slim chance at maybe swaying AP voters if they went all in to win this game. They gave up.
 
HurricaneJacket said:
UGA is playing FSU significantly better than they played us. Do you think this is due to the FSU opt outs, or does it just mean more to us than it does the gaggers right now?
Click to expand...

It's a mixture of FSU having many starters out this game, but also in our game vs Ugag, we obviously wanted it more. It's our super bowl, they treat it like a scrimmage. They sat several starters for our game vs them. This game doesn't really tell us much we didn't know, except how good of a matchup it could have been had FSU not had so many opt outs. Ugag should be blowing them out.

My family is divided down the middle with dad's side being Tech, moms side be Ugag. Moms side of the family doesn't really consider Tech a rival anymore, at least not like they do Florida, Auburn, Tennessee and Bama.

We have got to start beating those guys more than 1 out of every 7 or 8 years. We've been more competitive last 2 years, especially this season so that's a huge step in the right direction.
 
andrew said:
It's stupid that our legal system doesn't use the result of an exhibition college football game to determine the validity of a legal contract worth billions of dollars?
Click to expand...
In a world where billions and billions of dollars are spent on things like broadcasting rights for college football games and this is accepted by the people who care and those who don't - yes, it is absurd that the game results aren't included in the process.
 
The Jacket said:
In a world where billions and billions of dollars are spent on things like broadcasting rights for college football games and this is accepted by the people who care and those who don't - yes, it is absurd that the game results aren't included in the process.
Click to expand...

So if FSU is arguing that the ACC doesn't give them the resources needed to compete with the SEC and that should get them out of the grant of rights, and the result of the games should determine the legality of that argument...then I guess FSU should win their court case based on them getting blown out by the SEC?
 
andrew said:
So if FSU is arguing that the ACC doesn't give them the resources needed to compete with the SEC and that should get them out of the grant of rights, and the result of the games should determine the legality of that argument...then I guess FSU should win their court case based on them getting blown out by the SEC?
Click to expand...
That, or they can press rape charges. Can't be both though.
 
JJacket said:
And if a frog had wings it wouldn't bump its ass hopping.

If we had beaten UGAg and won the ACC and been undefeated, we would have easily been in. FSU is dog öööö.
Click to expand...
Why? We would’ve been the ACC Champ against 1-loss Bama who would’ve beaten UGA with Bowers. Why would we be in? We had almost the weakest ACC schedule. There is nothing to suggest that we would’ve gotten in especially as a team who was in ranked to start the year. UGA would be a 2-loss team in that case and Bama clearly in.
 
andrew said:
It's stupid that our legal system doesn't use the result of an exhibition college football game to determine the validity of a legal contract worth billions of dollars?
Click to expand...
No it’s stupid that FSU is trying to sit here and sue the ACC to leave when it’s blatantly obvious they would suck outside the ACC.
 
smokey_wasp said:
They got screwed for sure but they still had a slim chance at maybe swaying AP voters if they went all in to win this game. They gave up.
Click to expand...
They played their hearts out the last few weeks of the season to remain undefeated. Absolutely gutted out the ACCCG win. Then they were told by the playoff committee that results don't matter. You're asking these kids to make a decision that risks their financial future in the face of all evidence that demonstrates the futility. öööö that.

This game will be cited as evidence that the committee (and by virtue of lack of representation acting in FSU's best interest, the ACC) has materially harmed FSU by affecting their will to compete and that every transfer, opt out of the bowl game was a direct result of the committee's decision.
 
YellowJacket4Life said:
It's a mixture of FSU having many starters out this game, but also in our game vs Ugag, we obviously wanted it more. It's our super bowl, they treat it like a scrimmage. They sat several starters for our game vs them. This game doesn't really tell us much we didn't know, except how good of a matchup it could have been had FSU not had so many opt outs. Ugag should be blowing them out.

My family is divided down the middle with dad's side being Tech, moms side be Ugag. Moms side of the family doesn't really consider Tech a rival anymore, at least not like they do Florida, Auburn, Tennessee and Bama.

We have got to start beating those guys more than 1 out of every 7 or 8 years. We've been more competitive last 2 years, especially this season so that's a huge step in the right direction.
Click to expand...
If you haven't noticed, their best players are also out today, douchebag. We played the hell out of UGAg and should have won. Stop making excuses for them ööööing mutts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top