one 3-win season every four years or three 3-win seasons in a row. get MONKEN now.

gtrower said:
Ehh this is a pretty dumb time to call out people who didn’t/don’t like Collins. Especially after the last 3 years of CGC fan bois crying “CPJ lover” anytime anybody questioned this regime.

Idk if Monken is the direction I’d take things. I’m pretty confident he’d be above .300 here regardless of the roster he inherited. But I also think just about anybody could do that. Just about.
Click to expand...

Monken ain't the answer. The TO needs to stay away forever.
 
3 wins used to be a really bad season, came around maybe once a decade. Now it's the norm. We are Vanderbilt now. At least they can use the SEC as an excuse. What excuse have we got? Oh that's right, CPJ is our excuse. How long can we keep hanging out hat on that? It's kind of warn thin.
 
The Jacket said:
I seriously want you guys to help me understand. Why, instead of simply acknowledging that your preference in watching football is the option, do you act as though it is our best (or even only) path to being successful and, of all things, beating Georgia? I do not know who they are or if or when we will hire them, but there are a number of coaches who can be successful here and turn Tech back into a winning program. The overwhelming majority of them, nearly all of them, do not hold a primarily option-based philosophy. I get that you like the option. So do I, it's fun to watch when it's done well. But winning is the objective, not winning with your favorite kind of play call.
Click to expand...
"I do not know who they are or if or when we will hire them, but there are a number of coaches who can be successful here and turn Tech back into a winning program."

If you don't know who they are, how do you know they even exist, you ööööing imbecile?

I do not GAF one way or other about the 3O. It's neither my favorite kind of play call nor something I would feel "embarrassed" about.

But I'm old enough to remember why they brought in CPJ in the first place. It was a recognition that Tech could never win a conventional war by trying to out-Croot (I know you hate that, you ööööing cancer-wishing cocksucker) UGA, Clem's Son, Miami, FSU, or anyone in the SEC. Tech would be, is right now, and always will be at a talent deficit to those programs. Even super-Crooter CGC has not, and never will, overcome that. We needed - and still need - a different approach. We turned to a coach who had found a way to win a lot of games at Navy with an even bigger talent deficit than Tech has. A system that did not rely upon superior Jimmies and Joes to still win a lot of games. If we run the same systems as UGAg (for example) but with the inevitable inferior talent . . . WTF do you think the outcome is going to be?

NOTHING HAS CHANGED FROM THEN TO NOW. I care about winning as much as possible. NOTHING else. DNGAF if it's a Mickey Mouse offense, or a high school offense, or a pee-wee offense, or if it EVER gets ANYONE to the NFL. Not interested in winning February-April - I want to win September-December. Maybe it's an RPO based system. Maybe its a run-and-gun. But the 3O should not be ruled out. Teams have won a lot of games with the 3O with inferior talent.

Whoever we hire in 2022 or 2023 should be able to articulate a clear plan to winning games with inferior talent. Can Monken do that? I have no idea. If he can, then maybe we should hire him. If he can't, then No.
 
1982Jacket said:
"I do not know who they are or if or when we will hire them, but there are a number of coaches who can be successful here and turn Tech back into a winning program."

If you don't know who they are, how do you know they even exist, you ööööing imbecile?

I do not GAF one way or other about the 3O. It's neither my favorite kind of play call nor something I would feel "embarrassed" about.

But I'm old enough to remember why they brought in CPJ in the first place. It was a recognition that Tech could never win a conventional war by trying to out-Croot (I know you hate that, you ööööing cancer-wishing cocksucker) UGA, Clem's Son, Miami, FSU, or anyone in the SEC. Tech would be, is right now, and always will be at a talent deficit to those programs. Even super-Crooter CGC has not, and never will, overcome that. We needed - and still need - a different approach. We turned to a coach who had found a way to win a lot of games at Navy with an even bigger talent deficit than Tech has. A system that did not rely upon superior Jimmies and Joes to still win a lot of games. If we run the same systems as UGAg (for example) but with the inevitable inferior talent . . . WTF do you think the outcome is going to be?

NOTHING HAS CHANGED FROM THEN TO NOW. I care about winning as much as possible. NOTHING else. DNGAF if it's a Mickey Mouse offense, or a high school offense, or a pee-wee offense, or if it EVER gets ANYONE to the NFL. Not interested in winning February-April - I want to win September-December. Maybe it's an RPO based system. Maybe its a run-and-gun. But the 3O should not be ruled out. Teams have won a lot of games with the 3O with inferior talent.

Whoever we hire in 2022 or 2023 should be able to articulate a clear plan to winning games with inferior talent. Can Monken do that? I have no idea. If he can, then maybe we should hire him. If he can't, then No.
Click to expand...
:lol: Oh my goodness.
 
RamblinWreck92 said:
Monken ain't the answer. The TO needs to stay away forever.
Click to expand...
Why does the TO need to stay away forever? Are you embarrassed when folks call it a high school offense or Mickey Mouse? Please tell me you aren't one of those ööööers who would rather win 3-5 a year with a conventional offense than 7-8 with the 3O?

I'd run the single wing if we could consistently win with it.
 
Whoever we get needs to be someone with a legitimately impressive resume as a head coach. Don't hire someone whose current program's fans are desperate to be rid of him or is only "attractive" because of some ties to Tech.

We were not an appealing job last time around, I get that, but we took a huge risk in hiring a guy not on any other P5 school's radar, and the results have been brutal.
 
in what universe will this clown ever beat uga? I am afraid after this season, the outbound portal will look as big as some of your moms sphincters.
 
1982Jacket said:
Why does the TO need to stay away forever? Are you embarrassed when folks call it a high school offense or Mickey Mouse? Please tell me you aren't one of those ööööers who would rather win 3-5 a year with a conventional offense than 7-8 with the 3O?

I'd run the single wing if we could consistently win with it.
Click to expand...

But we can't. Nor can we recruit it.

If Weak Forest can win 8+ with non TO, so can we

Why do you think we need to be gimmicky to win?
 
1982Jacket said:
You have no goodness, you piece of öööö. Zero goodness. Now öööö off.
Click to expand...
756051448780947487.gif
 
we need someone that is rehabbing their image .. and is therefore less expensive and available. Briles, Freeze .. etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top