There have been many (unintelligent) comparisons in this thread and others to Saban, typically brining up his loss to ULM in his year one. Let's look at Sabans response/press conference for that loss:
"This is a great institution. We have great tradition. We have a lot of pride in what we do. I'm certainly not please with the way we are representing that tradition today. We did all the things in this football game that get you beat no matter who you play and that doesn't matter. It's a out what we do..."
He takes responsibility, notes the efforts he made, and how they weren't good enough.
"I'm very disappointed. I apologize to the people who support this program, that we didn't represent it with the class that it deserves to be represented with and we will get it fixed..."
Compare this to Geoff Collin's reaction/response to the question about negativity from the fanbase. The difference is absolutely astounding to me. Saban was in year one; he never once mentions inheriting a team from the previous coach, or any excuses. Saban stands tall and is direct to fans, media, and players. He stands as a leader. Collins is in year 3, with obvious talent advantages over NIU, lowers his head, can't respond to the fanbase, still blames others. Moreso when he was hired but a lot of people pointed to Collin's experience working for Saban as a huge positive. Collins certainly picked up on many things (recruiting, roster management, etc), but he clearly didn't get the leadership lesson, or the man-card lesson either. I pray Collins develops these better qualities (maybe some coaching abilities too) for the good of the program, cause this isn't headed in a good direction
Also, check out the comments on that Saban video...