RamblinWreck92
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Messages
- 13,562
Hey you're right
I know. And chop blocks are for cowards. Which is why you're a fan of 'em.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey you're right
LOL - I'd teach them what Duke's DC (And Clemson and everyone else) does: Jump over these flopping catfish and you'll have a free target of the ball carrier.
CPJ's refusal to adapt to big boy football (Our players are a bit bigger and faster than his teams at Navy and esp. high-school GA Southern) is his problem, not mine. Everyone wants to blame Sewak but he's coaching exactly what CPJ tells him to do.
I know. And chop blocks are for cowards. Which is why you're a fan of 'em.
I know. And chop blocks are for cowards. Which is why you're a fan of 'em.
No cut blocks are used based on the offense scheme. If you couldn't handle them you are the coward!
I know. And chop blocks are for cowards. Which is why you're a fan of 'em.
So is diving at the legs of a runner to tackle him. More players are injured that way than injured from cut blocks. I was in attendance at the USuCk / Tennessee game when Lattimore's leg got hurt and was flopping around after the tackle.cut blocking is a cheap-shot technique that needs to be banned entirely. This is a good step in the right direction. Cut and chop blocking are dirty AF.
No cut blocks are used based on the offense scheme. If you couldn't handle them you are the coward!
So is diving at the legs of a runner to tackle him. More players are injured that way than injured from cut blocks. I was in attendance at the USuCk / Tennessee game when Lattimore's leg got hurt and was flopping around after the tackle.
(1) If the cut block is delivered like it is supposed to be there is no jumping over.
(2) Please look up the blocking scheme for the PJ's Spread TO. The idea is the QB read is quick and allows him to move down the LOS quickly and cut blocking allows that if its done right. You don't want to use cut blocking if you're a heavy passing team which you are not. All blocking schemes can be overcome by "some " defensive athletes. That's where adjustments come in. GSU now uses a heaver O-line and uses zone blocking with the Pistol Option.
Worked well the first 2 years under HC Fritz, but not the lat 2 years.
No, it's still easily avoided, as most of our opponents have learned how to do. Maybe not for the "talent" that GSU faces but P5 guys know how to avoid that crap.
Wait, you said we're the Triple Option in another post. Whatever.
It's still a dumb blocking scheme and because of our over-reliance on it, our OLmen are like fish out of water when they're required to stand up and pass block on the 4-6 times/game that we try to throw it. Which leads to our tiny converted A-back QB having to run for his life.
“Either blocking below the waist is dangerous or it’s not. It’s not anymore dangerous five yards down the field than it is on the line of scrimmage. If it’s that scary, they ought to not tackle below the waist.” - Paul Johnson
Its funny how GSU played for 8 National Championships and won 6 using PJs Spread T-option & how GSU played in more playoff games than any other FCS school.
Its funny how Navy & Army turned there programs around using PJs offense.
I know, why don,t you get a defensive consulting fee to all the opponents of those schools.
You are right and Rainbow is just a silly little man that fears something he doesn't understand!
I understand that cut blocks downfield are now illegal and hopefully will be entirely illegal soon, just like chop blocks.
I also understand that people who didn't actually play the game and are cowards would endorse this chicken-öööö brand of blocking.
I know. And chop blocks are for cowards. Which is why you're a fan of 'em.
Inb4 every thread on the entire board gets locked.