The Gnome of Zurich
Varsity Lurker
- Joined
- May 20, 2003
- Messages
- 364
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Good points. But from my perspective right now, I am at a loss of words on Gailey. The press release would read something like this if it was Spurrier, or Friedgen, or the like: "We stunk on offense, couldnt score in the red zone. We stunk on defense, gave up huge plays. When you combine these 2 in a real game you lose. We have a long ways to go but only 2 weeks to be ready. These kids have got to pick it up now because they havent seen anything yet." At this stage, after that scrimmage, no compliments need to be given. Fear is the best motivator overall. I dont want these young kids to think they are even remotely there yet (in the papers). Yes, positive reinforcement is critical in practice. But at this stage, not in the public paers. My God that was ridiculous. This 50-50 stuff about some good some bad, played ok, yaddy yaddy yaddy is comical yet not amusing in the least. I am not bashing Gailey. I am saying I wish he wouldnt do it, but that's his style- I prefer another style that's all. But your points are very good and I agree to some extent.Originally posted by ncjacket:
Gnome, I think you're totally wrong. What the best coaches have in common is a way to get all their players playing at the highest level of performance. They all work hard and expect perfection. That's about all the commonalities in style you'll find. Vince Lombardi didn't treat all his players the same, but he had the same expectations of each. Phil Jackson certainly doesn't treat all players the same, neither does Bill Parcels. I think you're mistaking their expectations and personality for treating everyone the same.