Where is Dems?

The players went hard, they want to go hard, they didn't want practice to end so quickly. They are fine with things and want to go to the bowl game and play well, they are also excited about the new coaching and direction, what they aren't fine with is lackadaisical current assistants who keep insinuating it doesn't matter since they think they will be gone soon.

I bet I could guess which assistants you're talking about.
 
I guess all the assistant coaches feel like their job is over anyway and sticking around to coach the bowl game is just a formality.

Hopefully if someone is selected soon the team and staff can unite.

I have a feeling if they hire Muschamp, he'd make assistant coaches run laps for acting like that.



The players went hard, they want to go hard, they didn't want practice to end so quickly. They are fine with things and want to go to the bowl game and play well, they are also excited about the new coaching and direction, what they aren't fine with is lackadaisical current assistants who keep insinuating it doesn't matter since they think they will be gone soon.
 
A new interview which will please a lot of posters should be coming soon. An announcement last night prompted this.
 
I guess all the assistant coaches feel like their job is over anyway and sticking around to coach the bowl game is just a formality.

More than a formality, it's a legality. They're under contract.
 
I'd say that's a very, very small number that doesn't respect what the team has done.

when you boo at the game while the team is on the field (even if its at the big board), then IMO that is a lack of respect. MANY did that. It still makes me upset
 
Really hope Coach D isn't one of those. In the few conversations I have had with him, I've gained only respect. Hope they get it together out there, they were the ones that my classmates committed to working for out there on the football field and in the classroom. The coaches should stay committed to the players as long as they are still out there.
 
If that would make you happy, I'm going to have to ask you to stick to posts about baseball.

It would most definitely not make me happy. I was trying to think of which candidate mentioned would make the most people on this board unhappy, and it didn't take long to decide on the Tater Tot as the name to mention.
 
The way I interpret this information is that Muschamp was the choice but fell through and now we are moving on to some other candidates.
 
The way I interpret this information is that Muschamp was the choice but fell through and now we are moving on to some other candidates.

Thats not it. He is still on campus and will be tomorrow as well.

Now that the game is over I will say it, sounds like PJ is trying to get himself in the mix. He wants to be considered and interview.
 
The way I interpret this information is that Muschamp was the choice but fell through and now we are moving on to some other candidates.

I disagree. I think it means that Muschamp's still in it but we're gonna talk to Hatcher and Rad will choose between the two.

I'm good with either of them.

Ok, yeah, a little wishful thinking there. I'm guilty :fingersx:
 
A new interview which will please a lot of posters should be coming soon. An announcement last night prompted this.
Does this mean that P Johnson or Hatcher is going to interview...I am just guessing...Who could it be!
 
when you boo at the game while the team is on the field (even if its at the big board), then IMO that is a lack of respect. MANY did that. It still makes me upset

In that Chan Gailey was getting booed and not the players, you should probably feel upset at yourself now for not joining in.
Seems like the head man and a number of his cronie assistants really did let this program down. Good riddance.
 
Actually the way that's worded makes me think it will be Johnson. Maybe we couldn't talk to (about) him before the Army game.
 
Back
Top