TampaBayJacket
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2009
- Messages
- 4,261
That gotdammed diamond formation ruined all of CFB forever.
That gotdammed diamond formation ruined all of CFB forever.
It’s coming however. It might take a big slowdown or depression to cause it.We the fans are responsible. We keep consuming regardless of the product or culture and motives of the power brokers capable of defining and redefining the product. As long as it is profitable and the trajectory supports their desired results it will evolve to that end and only that end and the voting weight of the consumer will ONLY be recognized when we stop, in meaningful numbers , attending, watching, buying gear and stop donating. Even then it is likely that the damage is done and there is not a large enough replacement population of the hard core fan with nostalgic love of college game. I suspect the business model will become much more focused as a niche ( but large niche) tied more contractually to the NFL. Is this bad or wrong? Not saying that all. Time will tell. Football has a following. No arguing that. Just saying the eyeballs and wallets of the fans have the power. So far it appears not enough have bailed to slow down this train?
So how is it ESPN’s fault? Oh you mean because of the golden GOR all the ACC signed in 2013 until 2036? So where is the “slanting the playing field” again? Nice rebuttal against facts.Does ESPN pay the ACC the same amount they pay the SEC? If not they’re slanting the playing field.
1. How did the UM sign stealing thing look against PSU, tOSU and Alabama? Every single team cheats. As the saying goes, if you’re not cheating, you’re not trying.The Big10 should have made Michigan forfeit games due to Har-bum's sign stealing scandal.
Big10 contributed geographically grabbing Md/Rutgers then USCw/UCLA.
I didn’t say it was ESPN’s fault. I didn’t say the ACC didn’t screw up. I said if ESPN doesn’t pay every school the same amount they are slanting the playing field. And I’m correct.So how is it ESPN’s fault? Oh you mean because of the golden GOR all the ACC signed in 2013 until 2036? So where is the “slanting the playing field” again? Nice rebuttal against facts.
What incentive does ESPN have to give the ACC more $$$ when they don’t have to? ESPN is laughing at that dinosaur contract that was signed by the ACC, while the B1G and sec will again be up for negotiations for more $$$ before 2036.
So by that logic the ACC and ACC alone is “slanting the playing field“ in the wrong direction, which is why the inevitable is going to happen before 2036 when FSU leaves.I didn’t say it was ESPN’s fault. I didn’t say the ACC didn’t screw up. I said if ESPN doesn’t pay every school the same amount they are slanting the playing field. And I’m correct.
No. ESPN is an equal participant. I understand why they pay different schools different amounts, but the outcome is that they are slanting the playing field.So by that logic the ACC and ACC alone is “slanting the playing field“ in the wrong direction, which is why the inevitable is going to happen before 2036 when FSU leaves.
There is absolutely no reason ESPN should pay each ACC, B12, etc program the same amount when the contract in place says otherwise.
The issue isn't that they pay teams different amounts. The issue is that because they invested more money in some teams than others, they use their platform to ensure the teams they spent more on give more of a return by making them seem more attractive to watch, which then has a knock on effect of slanting the playing field.No. ESPN is an equal participant. I understand why they pay different schools different amounts, but the outcome is that they are slanting the playing field.
I agree, but even if they treated every school the same otherwise, giving different amounts of money still tilts the field.The issue isn't that they pay teams different amounts. The issue is that because they invested more money in some teams than others, they use their platform to ensure the teams they spent more on give more of a return by making them seem more attractive to watch, which then has a knock on effect of slanting the playing field.
The PAC conference slanted the table so much that they all fell off except for Washington State and Oregon State.No. ESPN is an equal participant. I understand why they pay different schools different amounts, but the outcome is that they are slanting the playing field.
the voting weight of the consumer will ONLY be recognized when we stop, in meaningful numbers , attending, watching, buying gear and stop donating.
I’m not convinced that parity should be the goal for CFB. Underdog stories are one of the best parts of college sports, and outside of GT football, big upsets are the most intriguing thing out there. You just don’t get that in pro sports.The NFL realized at some point that the value of the league was maximized by increasing parity (outliers excepted).
The people who control college football are too stupid to figure that out. Classic case of killing the golden goose with short-sighted greed.
I don't see why you should blame Clemson for everythingDon't want to seem to obvious but I'd have to say it was the f√¢k ups that screwed it up the most.