If Gailey had been a good enough coach to beat U[sic]GA, we wouldn't have been 4-4 in the ACC.
Would you prefer ?
- Thread starter MacDaddy2
- Start date
If Gailey had been a good enough coach to beat U[sic]GA, we wouldn't have been 4-4 in the ACC.
This is not a zero sum game.
Gailey was good enough to beat Auburn on the Plains and #3 Miami in Miami in the same year, a year in which both programs were better than Georgia, yet we still lost to the Dawgs and went 5-3 in the ACC.
Stop giving Georgia so much power over not only Tech but also the rest of the schools in OUR conference. Beating them is grrrrrrrrrrrreat but (a) does not guarantee anything, or (b) help us toward our goal of winning national championships as much as winning the ACC does.
Gailey was good enough to beat Auburn on the Plains and #3 Miami in Miami in the same year, a year in which both programs were better than Georgia, yet we still lost to the Dawgs and went 5-3 in the ACC.
Stop giving Georgia so much power over not only Tech but also the rest of the schools in OUR conference. Beating them is grrrrrrrrrrrreat but (a) does not guarantee anything, or (b) help us toward our goal of winning national championships as much as winning the ACC does.
Georgia would never agree to that. They may not be brain surgeons, but they know how to keep Tech down. Why would they surrender their end of season depth advantage?
ga_tech_fan11
Flats Noob
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2002
- Messages
- 562
THIS YEAR ONLY...Beat uga (I don't think I could handle another loss)
Like Joe said a couple of years ago, "you don't get a ring for beating uga."
Like Joe said a couple of years ago, "you don't get a ring for beating uga."