Will CPJ's offense bury GT football in the long run?

QuadF said:
The SAs take survey of calc at gpc over the summer. The only people who think its difficult are the retarts who complain about it here and UNC's athletes.
Click to expand...

The actual course is not the reason, it's the negative recruiting from other schools who go to our top targets and say "They force you to take calculus and they run a high school offense that will never get you into NFL." Basically all the dumb öööö machete is saying in this thread.
 
texstinger said:
They do indeed have scrimmages with 1 vs 1, 1 vs 2, and 2 vs 1.

And outside those scrimmages, the D is practicing vs guys recruited to run our O.
Click to expand...
If this was true, then spread teams should be unable to stop pro style offenses, and vice versa. Defenses from power running teams like Stanford would get torn apart by the spread, since they don't have spread personnel on their scout team.

But they don't. Stanford has a great D every year and does fine against West Coast spread offenses. Alabama is about as vanilla as they come offensively, but destroys offenses of all kinds.

It's not about the offensive scheme. It just isn't.
 
Last edited:
Akinji07 said:
The actual course is not the reason, it's the negative recruiting from other schools who go to our top targets and say "They force you to take calculus and they run a high school offense that will never get you into NFL." Basically all the dumb öööö machete is saying in this thread.
Click to expand...

So if you take away that part about the high-school offense, do you think that'd generate more top targets? Or is the answer still Calculus?
 
texstinger said:
They do indeed have scrimmages with 1 vs 1, 1 vs 2, and 2 vs 1.

And outside those scrimmages, the D is practicing vs guys recruited to run our O.
Click to expand...

Why am I not surprised you’re arguing with someone who actually participated in the practices and was there to see what happens?
 
johncu said:
If this was true, then spread teams should be unable to stop pro style offenses, and vice versa. Defenses from power running teams like Stanford would get torn apart by the spread, since they don't have spread personnel on their scout team.

But they don't. Stanford has a great D every year and does fine against West Coast spread offenses. Alabama is about as vanilla as they come offensively, but destroys offenses of all kinds.

It's not about the scheme. It just isn't.
Click to expand...

Stop making sense
 
QuadF said:
The SAs take survey of calc at gpc over the summer. The only people who think its difficult are the retarts who complain about it here and UNC's athletes.
Click to expand...

Not sure if that is allowed anymore.
texstinger said:
They do indeed have scrimmages with 1 vs 1, 1 vs 2, and 2 vs 1.

And outside those scrimmages, the D is practicing vs guys recruited to run our O.
Click to expand...

I’ll concede, 10 mins of 1vs1 live contact is done on Tuesday. The other 5 hours is dedicated to our opponent
 
RamblinWreck92 said:
We'll bounce back from this crap once it finally ends. Contrary to the "We can't do any better than CPJ!!! crowd of whiny pussies, we actually can and will once it's over.
Click to expand...
You need to tell us what's going to change beside the coach that will make the program more successful. Changing coaches has not done it.
 
I can’t wait to see this board implode once we evolve into a spread RPO, bubble screen and doing zone reads out of the gun on 4th & inches
 
Why does every criticism about CPJ have to revolve around his offensive scheme? It drives me absolutely crazy. The offense kicks ass with mediocre talent at GT, and his former assistants are using variations of it with great success at smaller schools.

Why can't you just say he sucks at hiring DC's and is too stubborn to replace his OL coach who has been absolutely awful for pretty much his whole tenure except for the Shaq Mason years? Those are valid criticisms and actual weaknesses of our program.
 
johncu said:
Why does every criticism about CPJ have to revolve around his offensive scheme? It drives me absolutely crazy. The offense kicks ass with mediocre talent at GT, and his former assistants are using variations of it with great success at smaller schools.

Why can't you just say he sucks at hiring DC's and is too stubborn to replace his OL coach who has been absolutely awful for pretty much his whole tenure except for the Shaq Mason years? Those are valid criticisms and actual weaknesses of our program.
Click to expand...
Because reasons. :bfd:
 
Akinji07 said:
The actual course is not the reason, it's the negative recruiting from other schools who go to our top targets and say "They force you to take calculus and they run a high school offense that will never get you into NFL." Basically all the dumb öööö machete is saying in this thread.
Click to expand...

Recruits believe that “dumb öööö”.
 
johncu said:
Why does every criticism about CPJ have to revolve around his offensive scheme? It drives me absolutely crazy. The offense kicks ass with mediocre talent at GT, and his former assistants are using variations of it with great success at smaller schools.

Why can't you just say he sucks at hiring DC's and is too stubborn to replace his OL coach who has been absolutely awful for pretty much his whole tenure except for the Shaq Mason years? Those are valid criticisms and actual weaknesses of our program.
Click to expand...
I’m bothered by CPJ’s perception that the players need to motivate themselves. I’m no rah-rah guy but I think a lot of 18 year olds are looking for leadership and guidance on how to act and feel. That’s as much a part of the coaching they need as assignments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top