öööö the SEC

[ibeeballin]

His literacy is just fine, especially for a football board.

All you are doing is taunting a Tech player. Why so butthurt?

His taunts are about effective as a CDP offense in the red zone.

 

[donsue]

You may want to disclose your beef with Monken before criticizing him, so everyone knows you have an axe to grind here.

He wanted a shot at Lucy Matthew’s…

 

[coit]

Actually, at the time I assume you did that, WOW (which of course, may not be available to you) had both.

DirecTV, AT&T TV (at the time) has both as well. @gtphd frequently doesn't know what he's talking about.

 

[GTRules]

The spirit of Christmas is strong in this thread

Or is it Xmas?

Those words are equivalent.

 

[GTRules]

You epitomize every UGA insult of Techies by sitting on a ööööing message board & grading post with a red pen. What a dork lol

fify fyi

Posts.

 

[GTRules]

His literacy is just fine, especially for a football board.

All you are doing is taunting a Tech player. Why so butthurt?

Are players immune from taunting? Is that one of the rules?

 

[cyptomcat]

Are players immune from taunting? Is that one of the rules?

Depends on the vaccination.

 

[Akinji07]

Go Cougars

 

[Akinji07]

Should have taken the points. Auburn too cocky for a 6-6 team.

 

[gtchief]

öööö the SEC

 

[JJacket]

I hope Houston runs away with this game and that DL who transferred to Auburn starts regretting his choice starting today.

 

[aeromech]

If they call that targeting on Smoke, that's criminal.

 

[JJacket]

Jesus overturned a targeting call for Auburn

 

[gtchief]

If they call that targeting on Smoke, that's criminal.

Launched leaving his feet, led with crown of helmet, contact with head or neck area

Overturned

 

[aeromech]

Launched leaving his feet, led with crown of helmet, contact with head or neck area

Overturned

He barely brushed the guy, that would have been the worst targeting call I think I've seen if it had stood.

 

[Akinji07]

Houston needs a stop here and go to the locker room 10-3 or they’re gonna unravel.

 

[gtchief]

He barely brushed the guy, that would have been the worst targeting call I think I've seen if it had stood.

https://www.secsports.com/article/27981840/what-targeting

Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player
ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)

Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:

• Launch-a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
• A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
• Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
• Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet

"Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact"

Multiple indicators were present, namely bullets 1 and 3. The wording is such that forcible contact is not necessary, only attacking in such a manner.

Your opinion on how bad it is doesn't really matter.

 

[gtchief]

Bigsby destroying Houston

 

[JJacket]

Bigsby destroying Houston

And it is 10-6 Houston.

 

[aeromech]

https://www.secsports.com/article/27981840/what-targeting


"Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact"

Multiple indicators were present, namely bullets 1 and 3. The wording is such that forcible contact is not necessary, only attacking in such a manner.

Your opinion on how bad it is doesn't really matter.

Nope. You are still wrong.