ACC Bowl Record

[GTCrew4b]

I think you guys overestimate Stanford and temple and underestimate Vandy

 

[ScionOfSouthland]

Great match ups this year!

 

[LegendaryGT]

I think you guys overestimate Stanford and temple and underestimate Vandy

Stanford still has McCaffrey, right? The UNC run defense hasn't made enormous strides, and they stink in bowls anyway. Maybe he'll hit 300 yards.

 

[GTCrew4b]

Clinton Lynch > McCaffrey

 

[LegendaryGT]

Clinton Lynch > McCaffrey

Very true, but UNC still ded

 

[johncu]

Clemson - W,W
FSU - L
Louisville - W
Da U - W
Pitt - W
VT - W
UNC - W
GT - W
BC - L
NC State - W
WF - L

9 wins including Clemson's 2 in the playoffs. These matchups look really good for the ACC, IMO.

 

[johncu]

Very true, but UNC still ded

http://www.espn.com/college-football/recap?gameId=400869143

 

[LegendaryGT]

http://www.espn.com/college-football/recap?gameId=400869143

UNC's rush defense is currently #113 in the nation, they don't even play the same sport as Colorado. Granted, it's a small improvement over where they finished last year at #122, but that rank was compiled after their bowl game.

You may remember that game.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/matchup?gameId=400852724

 

[coit]

Clemson - W,L
FSU - W
Louisville - L
Da U - W
Pitt - W
VT - W
UNC - L
GT - W
BC - L
NC State - L
WF - L

6 wins

Wow, ACC looking to start out 2-0 on the first day!

 

[LegendaryGT]

I'm a little torn, because I have an 8-win opinion of the ACC as a conference, but when I look at the individual matchups I only see 5 definite wins.

Wins for sure:
Miami, Pitt, NCST, GT, VT

Losses for sure:
WF, BC, UNC

No idea:
FSU, Clemson, Louisville

I hereby officially amend my prediction in the following ways: all teams names are struck from the sections labeled "Wins for sure" and "Losses for sure" and are added to the section titled "No idea".

 

[GTWannaBee]

I hereby officially amend my prediction in the following ways: all teams names are struck from the sections labeled "Wins for sure" and "Losses for sure" and are added to the section titled "No idea".

Good decision. ACC now 3-0 to start off the bowl season. 2 of those are from your "losses for sure" section (I expected both to lose too).

 

[gtnc72]

Clemson - W,W
FSU - L
Louisville - L
Da U - W
Pitt - W
VT - W
UNC - W
GT - W
BC - L
NC State - L
WF - Big L

So 7 including Clemson's second

Off to a good start here, eh, with WF, BC, and NCSU all winning. Hope that trend (all losing picks) stops here and now!

 

[GTSurgery]

Anybody else get the feeling the ACC could go 12-0 with Clemson blowing out Bama in winning the NC, and talking heads would still talk about how tough the SEC/BIG10 was compared to the ACC.

 

[RamblinWreck09]

Off to a good start here, eh, with WF, BC, and NCSU all winning. Hope that trend (all losing picks) stops here and now!

I'm not accountable for any bad juju resulting from my picks.

 

[savbandjacket]

It's amazing how Wake isn't horrible when its gameplay isn't being given away by a radio guy.

 

[LegendaryGT]

Anybody else get the feeling the ACC could go 12-0 with Clemson blowing out Bama in winning the NC, and talking heads would still talk about how tough the SEC/BIG10 was compared to the ACC.

No, we're the ACC.

 

[LegendaryGT]

http://www.sbnation.com/college-foo...ball-conference-rankings-2016-sec-big-ten-acc

We could however, take the top spot without going undefeated.

 

[Flywheel]

3-0 so far, average margin of 2 touchdowns. Pretty good look.

 

[covingtonjacket]

No, we're the ACC.

"Better bring your A game." - perhaps inaccurate quote from ACC

 

[GoldZ]

5-1, not bad for the sisters of the poor!