Bowling!

WracerX said:
It would probably be South Alabama. But I would rather see that in person than watch GT/Rutgers/NW on tv.
Click to expand...
Same. I think Pinstripe pays a few extra $M but I believe so the bowl money is redistributed evenly with the exception of a playoff game.
 
WracerX said:
Looking at bowl projections and one had GT in the Pinstripe bowl and Cuse in the Birmingham bowl. That seems stupid. I think you would get more sales flipping the two. And I don’t think hotels are going to be a factor. You aren’t getting a significant number of stays with those teams the way they are.
Click to expand...
Pinstripe picks first and GT is a more attractive team than Syracuse.
 
BainbridgeJacket said:
Was it pretty, no. Is it the objective, no. But it's progress. We're going in the right direction. More to come from me when I'm sober.

20231118_231536.jpg
Click to expand...
Is that Bunnahabhain scotch?
 
gtphd said:
Good eye. Is it toiteach or 12 year? Can’t tell from the picture
Click to expand...
BJ said it was Ceobanach. It's been a couple of years since I bought anything from them and it was their simple 12 year. Any heavy peat/smoke/iodine tasting stuff from Islay is a bit much for me. The 12 was just right.
 
Questions:

1) is ACC guaranteed a Reliaquest bid this year?

2) If FSU isn’t in the playoffs, then the ACC has one more team than bowls?
 
Walton said:
Questions:

1) is ACC guaranteed a Reliaquest bid this year?

2) If FSU isn’t in the playoffs, then the ACC has one more team than bowls?
Click to expand...

#2 Shouldn't affect Tech. If I recall, the ACC Bowls priority order cannot pick a team with 2 fewer wins in Conference play for a bowl. This means Miami, BC, and Syracuse all are 3-5 or worse in ACC play and need to be picked after Tech. We should be guaranteed a Bowl, just how bad a bowl??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top