coit
Bullseye
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 92,333
Talk about petty BS. He's OK with the photo so long as Kelly is his coach, eh?
Winningest defined by number of wins. Not by winning percentage. Since football seasons are now 30%-50% longer than they were decades ago, it's a pretty misleading stat when comparing across the years.I heard on the radio today that Brian Kelly is the winningest coach in Notre Dame history. That surprised me.
Obviously this guy hasn't been around too many sidelines if a bird is controversial to him.Talk about petty BS. He's OK with the photo so long as Kelly is his coach, eh?
That would make sense. But they preceded the statement by giving his record at Notre Dame, which gives the listener the impression that is based on winning percentage. It was a country music station in Columbus, GA so I don't think they were doing it to be misleading; more than likely just reading something off an AP news ticker.Winningest defined by number of wins. Not by winning percentage. Since football seasons are now 30%-50% longer than they were decades ago, it's a pretty misleading stat when comparing across the years.
I think that's sarcasm. Because my guess is that all his ND colleagues would say he breached their trust by leaving the team when its on the brink of the CFP."It's all about trust." This could have been made so much more effective if the big video board behind him had shown testimonials about Kelly truly being a trustworthy guy by a few current ND players. He missed a great opportunity.
I came down here because I wanted to be with the best," Kelly said. "The standard of expectation. You're looked at in terms of championships here and I want that. I want to be under the bright lights. ... That's part of the draw."
There are actually some people who believe this, but I hope you're not one of them. Everyone except Alabama and Clemson would love to play the 'small ball' that ND has been playing under Brian Kelly. In the past four years they went 43-8 with 2 CFP appearances.Kelly just got tired of playing small ball. Despite all the nostalgia ND is a second tier program. ND needs to join a conference if they want to relevant a decade from now.
There are actually some people who believe this, but I hope you're not one of them. Everyone except Alabama and Clemson would love to play the 'small ball' that ND has been playing under Brian Kelly. In the past four years they went 43-8 with 2 CFP appearances.
There are actually some people who believe this, but I hope you're not one of them. Everyone except Alabama and Clemson would love to play the 'small ball' that ND has been playing under Brian Kelly. In the past four years they went 43-8 with 2 CFP appearances.
There are actually some people who believe this, but I hope you're not one of them. Everyone except Alabama and Clemson would love to play the 'small ball' that ND has been playing under Brian Kelly. In the past four years they went 43-8 with 2 CFP appearances.
You're comparing the state of ND's program with the state of Army's and Navy's? Huh? ND will never dominate CFB like it did in the mid-century era, when it was the only 'national' program with a national (ethnocentric) fanbase. But ND remains a rich program with lots of talent – and lots of recent success to show for it. The idea that they lost two recent CFP appearances proves they are irrelevant is ridiculous. It proves they aren't as good as the two teams that beat them, and on that, no one would disagree. But being 3d or 4th best in the country is the opposite of being a 'second tier program.' (Unless I guess you define first tier as two teams!)And got stomped in those 2 CFP appearances if memory serves. In this new college landscape, ND is in a very precarious position. How long will the alliance and the SEC want to play around with ND? Remember, Army and Navy have rich football histories with built in national fan bases too.