I don't know many that are saying it's easy to choose Key, they seem to me to be just saying it's a decision that can make sense. Both have their negative points. Key lost a tough game to UVA when his starting QB went out and the (then) #2 just wasn't ready. Certainly not good, but in the course of things this season, understandable. Miami simply has better personnel and the O decided to give the ball to them 4x. Part of that problem was that we were somehow picked to win that game - it was always a long shot. Again, no ugly loss is good, but we lose that game 4 of 5 times anyway. You cannot dismiss them, but neither should we make them determinative.
Chadwell, at the end of his 4th full season - with his coaches and his players, just got absolutely boat-raced by the major competition in his own conference. You can't possibly undersell that, but it should not be determinative either. However, when you look deeper at his W/L, you see he's racked up the numbers largely against bad teams. The ACC has come of those, but Tech has UGAg, Clemson, ND, FSU, UNC, and a few OOC's like Ole Miss, UT, etc. It's just a much tougher league. If he cannot, in his 4th season, hang with JMU then how is he going to scale up to what he would face at Tech week after week? That is my concern. Plus... it's just a whole new start-over. I'm tired of starting over.