ScionOfSouthland
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,789
Early reports are that Pruitt is out, Muschamp is in, and Smart is bringing the Alabama S&C coach with him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Early reports are that Pruitt is out, Muschamp is in, and Smart is bringing the Alabama S&C coach with him.
Now I know you're full of crap. But I also know of Tech fans who ARE OK with losses like Saturday's and find such games to be "moral victories".
I figure these are the types of people who were given participation trophies as kids. "Everyone's a winner" kind of crap.
Me and you too brother, UGAG has wet the bed.I think this will fail spectacularly. I am positively gleeful.
Kirby may end up being awesome but how many schools in the SEC, ACC or in the country for that matter would hire him today over Richt given the choice of either?
Anyway, now this is a conversation how we shouldn't be okay with just keeping it close against Georgia, which is decidedly not what I was talking about in any way, shape or form so I'm out.
Nobody's okay with losing, and nobody takes any joy from moral victories. Losing is losing, and it sucks.
However, it's foolish to pretend like 13-7 is the same as 51-7. Both show up as losses on the scoresheet, but one means you're not likely to win the next time, and the other means you very well might. One means that some small changes (improved recruiting, schematic adjustment, etc.) could turn the tables in your favor, while the other means you might want to scrap it and start over.
I know you're not a Paul Johnson fan, but the reason people are willing to overlook this bad year and other periods of mediocrity is because it is obvious that the potential for seasons like 2014 is there. And who knows, if we can ever match a good defense with our typically outstanding offense, the sky is the limit.
Does that mean things are perfect? No. Does that mean we are happy with close losses? Of course not. Does it mean that we should accept things the way they are and don't make any changes? Not when we're 3-9.
Based on his entire career, Paul Johnson has provided plenty of evidence that he is a öööö good coach. This year is a statistical anomaly and will not be repeated. If it is, I'd be willing to bet that Johnson himself would step down long before anyone had to fire him.
Plus, why would UGA put a guy in with no HC experience when there are a lot of really solid candidates out there who have proven their ability to lead a team?
The thing is...it's been 8 years and we've not yet seen a competent Defense by a CPJ-coached team. I don't see a reason to be optimistic for change, in that regard, though Roof's squads have seemingly made more stops the past few years than the Groh's did. Perhaps next season?
I think both 2014 & 2015 were statistical anomalies. With 2 game exceptions in 2014, we got every break possible, in addition to making great plays. With...ummm...1 exception in 2015, we got no breaks and made no plays.
I think CPJ's realistic ceiling is 6-8 wins/year with his players in his system, which is what we've seen for 4 of the 6 years that he's had his players and his system.
Which is why him focusing on Defensive recruiting and adding some wrinkles to the offense should be top priority. We know what we get with his base package on both sides of the ball (Yeah I know Roof is DC but this is ultimately CPJ's team).
Muschamp is an amazing defense coach. He shuts teams down.
Unless it's against, at the time, a FCS team. In The Swamp. And the other team runs the TO.
...
I wouldn't call 2014 an anomaly. He's done it 3/8 seasons, ....
I don't really get it re: UGA and Kirby Smart. Like it or not as a Tech fan, but UGA is a really attractive job. Possibly top 5 in CFB, definitely top 10. They could call someone proven like Kyle Wittingham and he'd listen. Mark Dantonio would probably entertain a phone call. Gary Patterson, Tom Herman, the list goes on. Why would you skip over all of those guys and go directly for Kirby Smart? Just doesn't make sense to me.
I don't really get it re: UGA and Kirby Smart. Like it or not as a Tech fan, but UGA is a really attractive job. Possibly top 5 in CFB, definitely top 10. They could call someone proven like Kyle Wittingham and he'd listen. Mark Dantonio would probably entertain a phone call. Gary Patterson, Tom Herman, the list goes on. Why would you skip over all of those guys and go directly for Kirby Smart? Just doesn't make sense to me.