New OL Consultant Added to the Staff

ClubSeats said:
DD8FF0D1-3D78-4445-B8DD-A41B47447FC2.jpeg
Click to expand...
New Director of Player Personnel?
 
aeromech said:
I predict that if we win 6+ plus games this year, there will be two camps on Stingtalk. The 'Collins just needed time to flip the roster because the cupboard was bare' group; and the 'bringing in those new assistance coaches made a huge improvement' group.
Click to expand...
I'd belong in both of those camps. Here are my two:
1) Key transition assistants sucked and the transition roster has been ill-fitted (holdovers) or young
2) Collins finally cOaChEd eM Up and got rid of the dang music at practice and stopped designing the uniforms and playing kickball REEEEE yells at clouds
 
aeromech said:
Sewak put a better OL on the field than we've had the past 3 years, and yes we all thought Sewak sucked. This move to bring in Hevesy should confirm to everyone that the problem wasn't simply jimmies & joes.

I predict that if we win 6+ plus games this year, there will be two camps on Stingtalk. The 'Collins just needed time to flip the roster because the cupboard was bare' group; and the 'bringing in those new assistance coaches made a huge improvement' group.
Click to expand...
Not entirely true as it relates to assistants. Every big program has a ton of assistants recently. Bama, UGA, Clemson, etc. They are put in roles that cannot be controlled by the NCAA. Do you even know who the first CFB HC was who started this trend? Chan Gailey. The hire….Geoff Collins. Worked out pretty damn well. The 2007 recruiting class.

Nick Saban realized what he could do with a non field role, and hired Collins away from GT.
 
aeromech said:
So our $600K+ OL coach needs a consultant? Wasn't he supposed the be the best of the best of the best when we hired him?

Anyway, I am glad we are hiring some OL coaching help because we've needed it for the past 3 years.
Click to expand...
It’s crazy to me as well. Why don’t we look like New England up front if we have such a good position coach? That’s rhetorical, don’t answer that.
Stfu
 
aeromech said:
Sewak put a better OL on the field than we've had the past 3 years, and yes we all thought Sewak sucked. This move to bring in Hevesy should confirm to everyone that the problem wasn't simply jimmies & joes.

I predict that if we win 6+ plus games this year, there will be two camps on Stingtalk. The 'Collins just needed time to flip the roster because the cupboard was bare' group; and the 'bringing in those new assistance coaches made a huge improvement' group.
Click to expand...
The team wins 6+ and you are gonna fret over the arguments posed about program success over enjoying program success?
 
LibertyJacket said:
Explain.
Click to expand...
So, let me start with the reminder that he's the AHC and that was a condition of getting him here.

Chip Long - Brent pushed hard for him
Chris Weinke - This was part of the Long deal that Key was pushing, they'd all worked together previously at Tennessee
Mike Daniels - I forget how this hire came about
Del Alexander - More of Long ND connection, but Brent approved
Jason Semore - Geoff hire
Travares Tillman - Brent and him played together here, obviously a Brent recommendation

Jim Chaney was also Brent's doing.
 
BuzzinWreck78 said:
i'm not surprised that GOL still has some influence.
Key could be a nightmare if made a HC.
he still needs to start showing progress/results as OLC.
Click to expand...
Just looking at my previous post, he'd at least be able to put together a better staff than we've had. :shrug:
 
BainbridgeJacket said:
Just looking at my previous post, he'd at least be able to put together a better staff than we've had. :shrug:
Click to expand...

Probably. And despite my remarks about him in this thread he could be a decent head coach. He wouldn't be my first choice; but I would be ok with it as long as the contract was something we could get out of if it doesn't work.
 
aeromech said:
Is it the one where we are in the ACC Coastal with a bunch of first year coaches? Is there a P5 subdivision that would be less intimidating?
Click to expand...
What shocks me are all the fonts who think we'll take care of Clemson but think we have no chance versus Ole Miss. SEC bias, I guess.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top