Nice accomplishments, but more games played in season in modern era. Fewest losses in a season would be a better metric
Well played sir.Now it's time for Keymotherapy to eliminate any remnants of the stage 404 Collins cancer.
Heard a few other things from his Zoom call with media.
He'd live in Statesboro if it were warmer in the winter there.
His daughter is teaching voice classes at Grand Canyon University and is working on her PhD, so she may be leaving her opera career soon to start a family - which means he might be a grandfather in a couple of years. He said, "they tell me that's the best club to be in."
As soon as we get more coaches winning 11 games on the flats we can use the: Fewest losses in a season would be a better metric, to Rank TOP 5 seasons. But since 1951, unfortunately that list is it. But Ranking these 1-5 would look like this for me:Nice accomplishments, but more games played in season in modern era. Fewest losses in a season would be a better metric
I saw all of these teams play and agree with your list. One additional comment: although they had what was almost a fluke loss to Tennessee, I'd probably place the 1956 team third on your list in terms of greatness.As soon as we get more coaches winning 11 games on the flats we can use the: Fewest losses in a season would be a better metric, to Rank TOP 5 seasons. But since 1951, unfortunately that list is it. But Ranking these 1-5 would look like this for me:
1952
1990
1951
2014
2009
Agree. If you include 10-win teams, you will add 1998, 1956, 1947, and 1928 (MNC).I saw all of these teams play and agree with your list. One additional comment: although they had what was almost a fluke loss to Tennessee, I'd probably place the 1956 team third on your list in terms of greatness.
I think I remember someone posting a week of so ago that Dodd considered the '56 team his best, and I have read that elsewhere also.I saw all of these teams play and agree with your list. One additional comment: although they had what was almost a fluke loss to Tennessee, I'd probably place the 1956 team third on your list in terms of greatness.
And from 1950 to 1956, Tech under Dodd went 64-13-3, Talk about WOW!Agree. If you include 10-win teams, you will add 1998, 1956, 1947, and 1928 (MNC).
Also, I'd also add the 1917 Heisman team that went 9-0-0. It was as good as they could be. Those teams from the end 1914 to the beginning of 1918 did not lose for 33 straight games, tying only 2 in that span. Their records were:
Total for those 5 years was 36-3-2. Wow!
- 1914: 6-2
- 1915: 7-0-1
- 1916: 8-0-1
- 1917: 9-0-0
- 1918: 6-1
didnt like his attitude but he won.........our mistake is we knew soon teams would figure the 30 out and we had no throwing game or defense.He surly deserves to go into the Hall of Fame..........hiring Jeff to replalce him was a no brainer
found this in twitter
didnt like his attitude but he won.........our mistake is we knew soon teams would figure the 30 out and we had no throwing game or defense.He surly deserves to go into the Hall of Fame..........hiring Jeff to replalce him was a no brainer