ElCidBUZZingFAN
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2006
- Messages
- 25,104
If you read the text of the .gif, the words are Chinese sub-titled for "what's in the ööööing box?"I’m confused. You’re saying he didn’t say those words?
If you read the text of the .gif, the words are Chinese sub-titled for "what's in the ööööing box?"I’m confused. You’re saying he didn’t say those words?
What they did was outlaw the crack back block above the waist on Offense like we used to do with Bey Bey & Waller crashing in from a WR position to down block on Safeties and LBers, crack back blocks below the waist were outlawed a long time ago anyway.
The Fans of the previous Genius HC thought this was an anti Triple Option rule, but the Truth and Facts show it merely leveled the playing field, because crack back blocks on Kick Returns (Think Gary Guyton vs VT in a Thurs Night Game back during the CCG Era), and crack back blocks on Interceptions (think Bama vs Aaron Murray in the SEC-CG) were already outlawed before they finally got around to outlawing crack back blocks on plays from Scrimmage by WRs.
No grand conspiracy vs the Triple, just trying to make the Rules more consistent in different Areas of the Game.
Your mind is playing tricks on you. It took me a while to figure it out too. The subtitles in the GIF say "What's In F-ing the Box." Read it word by word very slow... when you read fast and skim over it you don't notice "the" is in the wrong place.I’m confused. You’re saying he didn’t say those words?
1) Many of the “crack backs” they call against set defenses are ticky-tacky and you see offensive players think they have to avoid any contact. It can be a BS penalty but kill a WR while he is airborne and it is a-ok.What they did was outlaw the crack back block above the waist on Offense like we used to do with Bey Bey & Waller crashing in from a WR position to down block on Safeties and LBers, crack back blocks below the waist were outlawed a long time ago anyway.
The Fans of the previous Genius HC thought this was an anti Triple Option rule, but the Truth and Facts show it merely leveled the playing field, because crack back blocks on Kick Returns (Think Gary Guyton vs VT in a Thurs Night Game back during the CCG Era), and crack back blocks on Interceptions (think Bama vs Aaron Murray in the SEC-CG) were already outlawed before they finally got around to outlawing crack back blocks on plays from Scrimmage by WRs.
No grand conspiracy vs the Triple, just trying to make the Rules more consistent in different Areas of the Game.
If you read the text of the .gif, the words are Chinese sub-titled for "what's in the ööööing box?"
Oh damn lol. My mind read it like it was right.Your mind is playing tricks on you. It took me a while to figure it out too. The subtitles in the GIF say "What's In F-ing the Box." Read it word by word very slow... when you read fast and skim over it you don't notice "the" is in the wrong place.
Brad Pitt says "What's in the ööööing box?"I’m confused. You’re saying he didn’t say those words?
We beat VT (with Bud Foster) in Blacksburg running 2 plays with the backup freshman QB. I don't think defenses ever "figured it out."PJ was good when he had good players and defenses hadn’t figured out how to defend the TO. But the defenses did figure it out. And it was really easy to stuff his TO against his rosters that finished at the bottom of almost every single P5 team’s recruiting class every February. There’s a reason PJ “retired”. The ride was over.
The Refs are taught 10 & 2 , just like on a clock face, if the Blocker comes from "outside" that 10 & 2 angle, then that is what Refs now look for on illegal crack backs by WRs and RBs when the play is from scrimmage.1) Many of the “crack backs” they call against set defenses are ticky-tacky and you see offensive players think they have to avoid any contact. It can be a BS penalty but kill a WR while he is airborne and it is a-ok.
2) The new cut rules are also pretty silly; they were likely thinking of TO teams when implemented. The main issue isn’t the TO scheme but it makes it much harder for smaller players to block effectively. That is what hurt GT because of the make up of the roster.
I wasn’t seeking guidance and I think that should be clear. I was replying to someone else that was implying, probably with zero first or even second hand knowledge that my ban on other sites was warranted or justified. So I was asking THAT person to clarify their position on bans. Because from my experience most pro ban, pro censorship types, simply want to ban opposing thoughts rather than unreasonable content or conduct and I’m curious if that is true for that person also.How about you take some time to learn the culture for yourself rather than starting out here by asking what you can get away with?
It seems like it takes a lot to get banned here (spamming the same thing over and over, douching up recruiting threads) and even then it’s most likely just a time-out.
I’ve caught a ban once in a long time, for making a particularly rude remark about Penn State in the football forum.
JRjr
I wasn’t seeking guidance and I think that should be clear. I was replying to someone else that was implying, probably with zero first or even second hand knowledge that my ban on other sites was warranted or justified. So I was asking THAT person to clarify their position on bans. Because from my experience most pro ban, pro censorship types, simply want to ban opposing thoughts rather than unreasonable content or conduct and I’m curious if that is true for that person also.
Feel free to express your own position but know that I’m not seeking your guidance.
Wow, why in the f#ck did we not do that every time that we played VT?We beat VT (with Bud Foster) in Blacksburg running 2 plays with the backup freshman QB. I don't think defenses ever "figured it out."
A back up QB beat them 3 times if I recall. Might have been only 2Wow, why in the f#ck did we not do that every time that we played VT?
Pot meet kettle, bubba. The insufferable assholes on here are the ones who post childish "yo momma" jokes loaded with sexual innuendo, and who seem to be at a loss for any non-profane words. I have no idea if you fall into that category or not, but this site has that reputation in the outside world, as being loaded with children.My position is that you sound like an insufferable asshole (like a lot of the other noobs that have popped up here recently) and I’m looking forward to when you get banned.
JRjr
My position is that you sound like an insufferable asshole (like a lot of the other noobs that have popped up here recently) and I’m looking forward to when you get banned.
JRjr
I think it was twice in a row in Blacksburg (Matthew Jordan in 2016 and Tobias in 2018). Matthew Jordan did run a few more plays though.A back up QB beat them 3 times if I recall. Might have been only 2