Shai McKenzie

gtzulu said:
3q4UhV3.png
Click to expand...

PAWWWLLLLL has been doing some squats. :biggthumpup:
 
The Champ said:
Yea. The fact that we offered someone else after his visit is a pretty good sign
Click to expand...

According to Eric's site we were planning on offering Leggette before McKenzie's visit, but we had to wait to double check that his grades were good (they were). That offer shouldn't really be considered indicative of anything - we'd seemingly love to take both.
 
GTJackets530 said:
According to Eric's site we were planning on offering Leggette before McKenzie's visit, but we had to wait to double check that his grades were good (they were). That offer shouldn't really be considered indicative of anything - we'd seemingly love to take both.
Click to expand...

And we most likely have said as much to them.
 
God loves Tech. I'm sure we'll get both.

Having said that, this kid is an idiot for not going to VT. That girl is bangin'!
 
that picture... can we not post things that will make people throw up?
 
wesleyd21 said:
God loves Tech. I'm sure we'll get both.

Having said that, this kid is an idiot for not going to VT. That girl is bangin'!
Click to expand...

Mm-hmm. I'd at least be going to VT that night ... if that's what I needed to say anyways. :naughty::cool:

That said, the city of Atlanta produces better than that.
 
Nashville Jacket said:
Something is very wrong if this coaching staff is unable to sign at least one top RB every year in a run first offense.
Click to expand...

I agree 100%. We might not attract all great backs but the chance to headline our offense should always allow us to bring in at least one top-shelf back every year.

midatlantech said:
Whatever [Mama's influence] is, it's always the wrong one for us.
Click to expand...
Calvin Johnson's mother would like a word with you.
 
00Burdell said:
I agree 100%. We might not attract all great backs but the chance to headline our offense should always allow us to bring in at least one top-shelf back every year.
Click to expand...
I think it really depends on the field of "top shelf backs" each year and how many of those have any interest whatsoever in a very challenging yet rewarding academic life.
 
We can't even get Joe Hamilton (the guy who is worshiped like a god here) to bring in his little cousin who is a running back.
 
gtzulu said:
Pitt already has two good running backs in their '14 class. We have zero. Academically, Tech > Pitt. Football-wise, Tech > Pitt. The only reason to lose out to Pitt is if he wants to be a homebody.
Click to expand...

Or he doesn't want to play in this offense.
Or he doesn't want to take Calculus.
Or he wants to go where the girl/boy ratio is better.

Your logic is flawed. Being a homebody may well be the reason but there are several other possible reasons.
 
daBuzz said:
Or he doesn't want to play in this offense.
Or he doesn't want to take Calculus.
Or he wants to go where the girl/boy ratio is better.

Your logic is flawed. Being a homebody may well be the reason but there are several other possible reasons.
Click to expand...

FB players aren't worried about the girl/boy ratio. They eat first when it comes to the ladies. Regular students worry about that.

The offense is the biggest issue IMO. Very easy to recruit against for RBs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top