GTCrew
Patrick Henry
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2002
- Messages
- 49,807
Im not sure the best teams are winning because of a few genius OC/DCs, but rather because they have a dozen ex-top-coaches behind the curtain. My OC would not necessarily call the plays. certainly wouldn't scheme the offense by himself. The consultants would do that. So if you lose the OC, the consultants carry on and you promote a position coach.I also agree with this premise, though I think they may be a more optimal approach. We cannot afford to higher a , Sabanesque, CEO-type of head coach if he is going to be making Power 5 HC salary. So that leaves you with two options.
My problem with #2 is that if this works, the OC and DC will be snapped up by another school with more prestige, and we will have to start over.
- Hire an emerging OC as HC who will also handle much of the OC duties, like CPJ. This will allow you to spend far less on OC, if you need one at all. I would look at OCs outside P5 who are doing something unique or innovative.
- Hire a HC with zero experience (Choice, Key, etc), or from d2 or d3, to be a CEO-type of HC. Would have to pay them far under P5 HC scale. Use $$ to pay for strong, emerging OC and DC talent.
Again, my opinion is that you have to recruit at a high level and coach at a high level. There is no longer enough time in a coaches' day to do everything required to win. Since only coaches are allowed to recruit, you have to move "coaching" off their plate. Their focus has to be recruiting, and the consultant's job is to coach (or help with all the aspects of coaching).
Last edited: