Who's In?

Who's In?


  • Total voters
    122
  • Poll closed .
Or force the P5 + independents into a P4 and the conference champs make the playoff.

G5 conferences become a subdivision with their own champion.

This. Tier 1 national championship for the P5 and Tier 2 national championship for the other conferences and independents. It seems an AAC or MAC team has little to no chance of making the playoffs as they are currently set up.

Also, we need to immediately invite Penn St. to the ACC as a big öööö you to Delaney and his Ohio St. bias.
 
I like how coverage of the playoff selection is now that Washington made it in over Penn State. :lol:
 
The problem with conference champs is that it doesn't allow for the team that lost early in the season but is playing well. The problem with not automatically taking conference champs is that Penn State gets screwed. But they are used to it I guess.

uhhmmm, PSU lost two early games and then went to the championship game of their conference. your comments seem to not make any sense at all. but we are used to it I guess
 
At least the BCS pretended to be rational and calculated. This system is now complete bullshit.

The best part is that a Bama/Clemson MNC game would be less controversial.
 
What's horrid about this system is that in the end, it favors revenue above all else. We only got the playoff when the LSU/Bama rematch in the BCS title game drew horrid TV ratings. Suddenly, all talk from the NCAA about how a playoff wouldn't work because of final exams vaporized.

2014: Two years ago, there was a big question about whether Florida State would be left out of the first CFP because even though they were unbeaten defending champs, they were playing like s*** until they edged us. TCU at #3 was a Big 12 co-champion with a razor-thin tiebreaking loss to Baylor, and Ohio State was on the outside looking in. Until they won the Big 10 conference championship game. Ohio State jumped TCU, who went down from #3 to #6 in a week they didn't play, and the committee sent a signal that outright conference championships matter.

2016: Fast forward to now. Penn State, whose fan base and brand has been decimated by scandal, wins the Big 10 outright. Ohio State gets in at 12-1 and leaves the Nittany Lions on the outside looking in, who are now champions of the best conference of the year and who have the strongest win of anyone in football (over OSU). Apparently now conference championships don't matter as much as record. So what changed since 2014?

Conclusion: Penn State got somewhat screwed. But TCU is the one who got royally screwed sideways, because we now know it wasn't the conference championship that mattered, but the OSU pedigree. Given that the selection committee is made of fewer members than even the coaches' poll, and they have a direct financial interest in who plays, can you really say that TCU's 55k stadium and moderate fanbase wasn't what cost them the spot in favor of Ohio State's revenue-spooging nation? We took a step in the right direction with the playoff, but three steps backward with this abominable committee.
 
Last edited:
uhhmmm, PSU lost two early games and then went to the championship game of their conference. your comments seem to not make any sense at all. but we are used to it I guess

The message is garbled but what he's saying is Penn st lost two games in Sept, haven't lost since and won their conference over Ohio St and Wisconsin, but still didn't make the playoff despite beating the team that got in over them. Basically he saying one way to interpret this decision is Penn st missed the playoffs in September and the rest of the year didn't really matter.
 
Ohio state would beat Penn state today

This is the least assured of all of the 'x would beat y now' guesses

Thats why PSU should have gotten in. they havent lost in 9 games, including besting OSU and then Wisconsin in the conference championship
 
This is the least assured of all of the 'x would beat y now' guesses

Thats why PSU should have gotten in. they havent lost in 9 games, including besting OSU and then Wisconsin in the conference championship
Vegas disagrees
 
Vegas disagrees
Vegas also gave a lot of money to people who bet on Trump.

----

I think OSU would handle Penn State in a rematch. Penn State would beat Pitt by a touchdown and Pitt/Clemson would be a coin flip game again because Clemson is a random team this year. And all of those teams would beat Washington by more than six points.

And Penn State should have gotten in over OSU, not because OSU isn't a better team, but because they won head-to-head and they won their conference.
 
Vegas also gave a lot of money to people who bet on Trump.

----

I think OSU would handle Penn State in a rematch. Penn State would beat Pitt by a touchdown and Pitt/Clemson would be a coin flip game again because Clemson is a random team this year. And all of those teams would beat Washington by more than six points.

And Penn State should have gotten in over OSU, not because OSU isn't a better team, but because they won head-to-head and they won their conference.
You've got to be trolling.. If a team loses 4 games but beats a good team and happens to win their conference would you still say they should be in?
 
You've got to be trolling.. If a team loses 4 games but beats a good team and happens to win their conference would you still say they should be in?
There is one small, almost statistically impossible corner case for that happening, in which case the conference in question will be considered a joke. So yea, sure. I'm all for it.
 
Back
Top