Jacketeer
Flats Noob
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2017
- Messages
- 890
Which only further proves how awful their schedule was.So you agree you will cry foul? You act like Bama went 6-2 in their division. They lost 1 game to the division winner.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which only further proves how awful their schedule was.So you agree you will cry foul? You act like Bama went 6-2 in their division. They lost 1 game to the division winner.
Wisconsin lost one game to their conference winner. Played one more game. Both lost their last game.So you agree you will cry foul? You act like Bama went 6-2 in their division. They lost 1 game to the division winner.
Needs to go to 8 teams. All 5 P5 champs, plus 3 at large. Could even guarantee the highest ranked non-P5 conference champ gets in, plus 2 at large.
Yes.I'd expand this rule so that the at large pool has to be a division winner,or have a better record than the team that won the opposite division.
For instance if the Atlantic runner up is FSU at 11-1 with a loss to Clemson and the Coastal winner was 9-3 (5-3) then FSU would be eligible.
The committee woyld get a list of at large teams that fit the criteria and seed then with the P5 champs so long as one G5 was in the pool every year.
First round home games, 2nd neutral sites, Champ on the weekend
SEC. duh.What is Bama’s argument to go ahead of Wisconsin?
CFP was one step forward and 2 steps backward thanks to replacing the BCS formula with this abominable committee.
CFP was one step forward and 2 steps backward thanks to replacing the BCS formula with this abominable committee.
I'd flip it and say two steps forward one step back.
Would you really want to go back to the two team BCS?
No but I'd be totally fine going back to a 4-team BCS
The committee's job is to put in the best 4 teams in the country. Does anyone here think OSU is better than Alabama?