77GTFan
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2004
- Messages
- 9,635
Recruiting rankings are like potential, they look great on paper and give people something to talk about, but they don't mean öööö unless your team is meeting expectations and winning.
The recruiting ranking game is a joke. Like everything else in sports today it is driven by $$$. Pushy parents are paying big sums to “coaches” and “trainers” who promise to get their kids noticed. There is no question the big brokers pay big time to get their clients a higher evaluation. Ten years ago I would have said that if you had the talent, potential and performance you would get noticed and recruited. Now, I would say unless you are truly an elite talent, you will have to spend a lot for a favorable rating. And, if you are a good college prospect but do not have parents that get you to the right camps, all star games, and exhibitions and connect you with the right trainers, coaches and brokers you will probably get no or lesser offers.
Coaches play along because they know fans will praise them for recruiting the kids with the most stars and best reputations, even if those stars are unearned and reputations overstated. And, those fans will not appreciate you signing a lot of lightly regarded players, even if you did your homework and know they can play. It is sad how much less contact there is today with high school coaches in evaluating talent. We would rather listen to the private coaches, trainers, and other self-proclaimed experts making cash as a part of the recruiting process.