StraightFresh
Midtown Zoomer
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2021
- Messages
- 1,269
You, and everyone who thinks Paul Johnson or Geoff Collins or the combination of the two have spelled the death knell of Tech football, are oversimplifying the entire issue to a degree that I don't know how to describe it with an analogy. Paul Johnson gave us seasons and wins which we have had precious few of since the Dodd era. He did that with another guy's players and with his own. Nevertheless, when he left, we had a severe talent deficit, and Collins inherited that. Most people were fine with giving Collins the first year to look like total trash, and so we did. They should have been willing to accept the second year being rough as hell too, but we still had a number of people who decided that this didn't look like the rebuild they imagined in their cavernous heads, so they'd seen enough a year ago. Now, that number has increased and it is easy to throw together slogans and memes to mock our coach because people are sick of waiting for a reason to be optimistic. I get that. I also get that the same people don't know what the öööö would fix our program, they just know they're not happy with the way things are and they've got internet access. They may very well be right that Collins is a total clown and we will never be successful under him. But they don't know that, they only know they don't like this.
All this öööö is more complicated than the hypercondensed horseshit StingTalk is bursting with, but complications and critical thought don't net as many likes as "9in3"
It shouldn't take more than a single year to bring in enough athleticism to beat ööööing .500 Boston College at home
Mel Tucker is 9-1 at Michigan State in year two after inheriting less talent than Collins did