Article: No MNCs ever again

cyclejacket said:
The latest was 00Burdell just a few posts above this one - "
Look at our schedule this year - only one foregone loss and that is Clemson. Uga's roster was gutted but they look like the 2nd toughest right now. Every other game is winnable. Even if we lost to Clemson, we can still go to the ACCCG and play them again. What if we luck up and win. What if a few other awesome teams fall flat - Bama loses three games or something."

Some of the other threads have several mentions that UGa is vulnerable for us because of their massive eligibility losses. Since we've lost to them about 75% of the time in my lifetime I am skeptical of any proclamation that they are a winnable game on our schedule.
Click to expand...

Ok. Gutted this year. The team we struggled against last year was stacked.
 
DressCheeseSideSeaboard said:
They had 32 seniors on their team last year and a decade of top ten recruiting classes. How was their roster gutted and who are you hearing this from?
Click to expand...
If they had a decade of great recruiting, how was their talent last year much different than the year before?
 
GTRules said:
If they had a decade of great recruiting, how was their talent last year much different than the year before?
Click to expand...

They were top heavy with experience. 32 seniors seems like a lot to me. Probably some combination of redshirts, grayshirts, and a couple of years with fewer arrests. I don’t know. I don’t follow the dwags that closely to know how they did it.
 
DressCheeseSideSeaboard said:
They were top heavy with experience. 32 seniors seems like a lot to me. Probably some combination of redshirts, grayshirts, and a couple of years with fewer arrests. I don’t know. I don’t follow the dwags that closely to know how they did it.
Click to expand...
But apparently the point was that the dwags had recruited so well that there was no way we could beat them, even though we did it two of the last four years.
 
GTRules said:
But apparently the point was that the dwags had recruited so well that there was no way we could beat them, even though we did it two of the last four years.
Click to expand...

That’s not what I meant. I think we’re saying the same thing. There’s little reason to believe last year’s outcome is the new normal.
 
I'm LMFAO at all the dorks in this thread shredding my "lack of data, qualitative you-dont-know-shit" posts with a reply that lacks data and is too a totally qualitative, reeks of "I-dont-know-what-I'm-talking-about" BS post. It's just like politics where everybody thinks they know what theyre talking about but nobody really has any knowledge and is just slinging BS. Ah, that's what keeps me coming back to this board. It would be boring if folks all agreed.
 
I'm not arguing with this guy, but I wish he would use his crystal ball for more important stuff. Will we be invaded by Martians? What's the stock market going to do? Will Trump be impeached? Will Clinton get indicted? Will peace break out in North Korea and spread to Iran? Will my dog come home? Will UGA get serious about academics? Will there be another season of The Curse of Oak Island? I'm sure this genius knows just as much about these things as he knows about whether Tech will ever win another national championship.
 
ElCidBUZZingFAN said:
CPJ has averaged 2 drafted per year - just like we’ve done since 2000.
Click to expand...

True MNC contenders are having more like 2 players drafted per round of the NFL draft. Also, I’m doubting the 2 per year average, especially if you discount players actually recruited by Gailey. Who wants to volunteer to do a breakdown of draft picks that were true CPJ recruits?
 
JoeCakeEater said:
True MNC contenders are having more like 2 players drafted per round of the NFL draft. Also, I’m doubting the 2 per year average, especially if you discount players actually recruited by Gailey. Who wants to volunteer to do a breakdown of draft picks that were true CPJ recruits?
Click to expand...

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/schools/georgiatech/drafted.htm

If you wanna start in 2011 with Anthony Allen who transferred in under CPJ, its 11 in 8 years, so a little under 1 and a half per year. We had 4 picks in both 2009 and 2010. 2010 was our best draft in recent memory, Im sure. 2 first rounders.
 
Since draft picks seem to be the measure of the man, I'll just point out that we had way more draft picks from the coach who couldn't beat Uga with O'Leary's recruits or his own recruits than we've had from the guy who can't recruit but who has beaten the dwags more times since 2008 than everyone not named Steve Spurrier or Nick Saban.

But keep on counting draft picks as the metric we need to worry about.
 
00Burdell said:
Since draft picks seem to be the measure of the man, I'll just point out that we had way more draft picks from the coach who couldn't beat Uga with O'Leary's recruits or his own recruits than we've had from the guy who can't recruit but who has beaten the dwags more times since 2008 than everyone not named Steve Spurrier or Nick Saban.
Click to expand...
I thought the guy that had beaten the Dogs the most times since 2008 was named Mark Richt?
 
Akinji07 said:
It says we're never winning a natty.
Click to expand...
With coaching salaries by the 10 or 12 big time factories , he is probably correct. We are never going to pay 7 mil a year for a HC. Like i said in an earlier post there will end up being only about a dozen schools who can actually win the NATTY.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top