This is what people resort to when they can't prove anything they say.
LOL, you're funny. At the end of this post, I'm going to own you. and the guy who posted the "ownage" comment can come back on here bow down to my superiority of football knowledge and the rest can just STFU.
Like I said.. stats can help anyone prove an opinion. But to you that's what people resort to when they can't prove anything... ok. Lets play your game shall we?
Its my opinion that he has underperformed. My opinion is based on having watched his games. How many games have you watched of Calvin Johnson's?
In the second game this year you know how many of his 10 targets actually hit him in the hands? You know how many times he was open with separation from the DB's?
Hill threw the ball 54 times on Sunday, completing 34 times and Calvin managed to catch 6 balls for less than 26% of the total passing production of the offense.
I mean certainly someone who is on the level Calvin Johnson should be, should account for more targets and more of the offensive production right?
Calvin represents 18.5% of the completions of his team.
Calvin represents 21.6% of the targets thrown this year.
Calvin represents 22% of the total passing offense for Detroit.
Larry Fitzgerald as a comparison for THIS year only when he has a terrible QB is 45% of the completions of his team THIS year. a WHOPPING 63.8% of the targets thrown to receivers THIS year. and represents a poor 28.5% of the passing offensive production.
Like I said... Calvin isn't getting good separation as is clearly evident by these numbers AND on top of that it would seem to indicate that Calvin is underperforming to the potential he has.
Man, stats are a bitch aren't they? Like I said you can use them to make about any argument. I made a statement... I backed it up with factual evidence. Its my opinion. If you disagree, I understand... but don't ****ing tell me I don't know what I'm talking about dickhead.
You would like to think I'm talking out of my ass. But you just don't like the way I'm clear cut no bull**** and blunt. The bottom line is I have a point and its pretty evident by those numbers.