We were bad enough, according to our posters, that our coach got fired.
Those 5 are certainly "quality" players. They would get playing time at most schools they could transfer to. He's gonna need a lot more just like them or better. A LOT more. It's going to be a thin cupboard in year 1 and I'd be surprised if what they have so far and what they get before kicikoff moves the needle much. We'll see.
You missed the whole point of conversation. The sheer number of transfers likely IS a problem because they will be losing some of those underclassmen you speak of, but that's not what we were referring to. He was saying look at all the production that left, i.e. players that have been starting, had lots of playing time, tackles, yards, TDs, whatever. My point to that was that losing guys that were getting all the playing time isn't always a bad thing. All those guys getting all those stats made up the absolute worst P5 team.If those leaving were underclassmen and about to replace starters who have used up eligibility, then you've lost a lot.
Would you have been OK losing Jon Dwyer after his freshman season? He was behind TC. How about Josh F'ing Nesbitt?
im not getting paid to list all 47 new enrollees and transfers. Those were just some off the top of my head
Also, Colorado has roughly 63 guys on scholarship with commits coming in daily.
They Just added another one
Omarion Cooper - Florida State Seminoles Defensive Back - ESPN
View the profile of Florida State Seminoles Defensive Back Omarion Cooper on ESPN. Get the latest news, live stats and game highlights.www.espn.com
Was Tech more talented or less talented in year 1 with CGC?
Depends on how you rate talent. If you just base it on your own subjective opinion, then it only means what you think it does. If you base it on calculated rankings from recruiting services, then here is your answer:Was Tech more talented or less talented in year 1 with CGC?
21 tackles in two seasons at FSU.
I never said Walton was a big loss. Not like he was Landry or Scott back thereWhen the narrative became you have to play immediately as underclassmen? I thought GT were about developing players
He has just as many INTs in 15 games as Zamari Walton had 5 seasons and y’all said he’s big loss
Trying to cobble together a new OL with zero starts together is a recipe for a freaking disaster in CO, this is going to be ugly on a scale rarely ever seen
I doubt Deion will be happy when that OL gets his son blasted.Trying to cobble together a new OL with zero starts together is a recipe for a freaking disaster in CO, this is going to be ugly on a scale rarely ever seen
If it goes really bad this coming football season, Deion will give the speech of this team was 1-11 last year. And he will have a point.And then the actual problem with this whole Deion endeavor will emerge, one that people should know already but none of the proponents have addressed, much less admitted. And that is the other side of the ego coin. Sure, it's great now when he's giving animated passionate speeches and when he was winning, but once things get tough, then and only then will we see the most important part, not his coaching abilities but his leadership qualities. Everything is downstream from that. My guess is that it will go something like an even more hostile version of "they just don't want to see the progress".
As the head guy, when things are legit looking bleak with some results to show for it so it's not just speculation, will he take ownership or blame others? In this regard does he turn out to be far more Geoff Collins than Jocko Willink. Will be interesting to see.
If it goes really bad this coming football season, Deion will give the speech of this team was 1-11 last year. And he will have a point.
Deion has actively attracted every bit of the pressure he will endure. I’d have a hard time seeing it as “unfair.” It’s entertaining as hell, though, and that’s what he’s got going for him.Maybe you are right but I think you are vastly underestimating the size of his ego and the impact that will have. There is certainly plenty of evidence of his ego out there to draw a plausible conclusion from. We don't have enough tough leadership examples but we will likely have some soon enough.
Also, I don't think he will have as much of a point as you think. With the unprecedented amount of turnover, I don't think it's valid to say this team went 1-11 last year. For better or worse, these are going to be his guys. Saying those poor saps that were here last year went 1-11 doesn't resonate to anywhere near the same degree.
Now, if he goes out there and is at least average you can put this off, but if it goes terribly bad he will be under immense and probably unfair pressure, perhaps even unprecedented. How he responds to that is going to be interesting to watch.
Depends how you look at. I’ve said on numerous the biggest mistake Stansbury made was going public guaranteeing the scholarships and signees. If you’re going to rebuild, you need to go full rebuild. As horrible CGC was and as much he tried to reinvent the wheel, ADTS handicapped from Day 1.
Our OL literally did not know how to pass set. They had to be taught or retaught things that other players had 5+ yr head start on. Whether you deem that worst than having low ceiling players is you opinion.
When the narrative became you have to play immediately as underclassmen (which he did as true freshman)? I thought GT were about developing players
He has just as many INTs in 15 games as Zamari Walton had 5 seasons and y’all said he’s big loss
FWIW the Colorado AD promised the players and recruits that their scholarships and scholarship offers would be honored too. There was big stink about it a few months ago.
It will be interesting to see how the Colorado OL performs this year. Sounds like they are basically gathering a bunch of guys who haven't played together before, and may not even know each other.