cyptomcat
Hibernating
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2007
- Messages
- 68,979
I have 28k posts because I don't care to write or read essays about retarded opinions.First of all anyone who has nearly 28000 posts on here needs to get a life.
Be specific about why these two coaches would not be good for Tech. They each:
1. Know Tech
2. Stellar recruiters regardless of what some retards think about our recruiting. The Hill is in control.
3. Have had succes in coaching outside of Tech.
If we make a complete D scheme change what do you think happens next year...we spend the year learning the scheme and giving up lots of points as our guys make mistakes.
IMHO. Continuity is a good thing here. Groh was the problem and he has been outed for not really coaching more trying to teach. We have talent and our coaching staff is good. We can make a dramatic improvement next year by staying the course that was charted the last few weeks of the season.
Both Mccollum and Smith topics have been beaten to death on ST, I don't care to rehash.
I personally wanted to keep Kelly as DC, but to speak against Kelly (gt92 did) and then suggest Mccollum or Smith is retarded. I shouldn't have to explain.