I don't go along with the "redshirt him if at all possible crowd". I am in the "play him if he's anywhere close" crowd. If he's good enough now 3 or 4 years down the road doesn't matter because all you have to do is recruit his replacement a year sooner. He hasn't done anything yet but the assumption is we'll never find a recruit as good as him so we really need to redshirt him to have him 4 years from now. Nobody heard of him 3 years ago - who's to say there's not another 9th grader out there now that will be the next him in a few years when we need him. Just get that guy with the timing set so he redshirts, then backs up a year, then is ready to go. That could be 3 years or 4 years from now, doesn't matter.
The other thing is if you play Washington this year and he's so-so, but you move heaven and earth to "not burn Lee's redshirt" then all you've managed to do is set up a senior incumbent vs. new guy controversy for next year.
So if he's come this far in three days, just imagine where he'll be when the season starts. He'll probably have won a couple Heismans by then.
If he can win the starting job, play him IMO, but do not play him as a backup. Better to have him start 4 years than to lose one year to mop-up duty and junk minutes.
Also, PJ should take into consideration where he thinks Vad would be by the end of the season, progression wise, if he played from the get go. Let's say right now, on a scale of 100, Tevin rates an 80 in PJ's mind, and Vad a 70. Does he think that Vad could progress to an 80 or beyond by the VT game? Look, we're gonna roll in 2 out of first 3 games even if we put Preston Lyon as our QB... I would have said 3 out 3, but last year was a sobering experience in that regard.
Let's say we start Vad from day one. He's gonna go through the struggles that any frosh QB would go through. However, I know I'd trade an early season loss against Kansas if it meant Vad gave us a better chance to beat VT and UGA at the end of the season. This is the way I'm hoping PJ is thinking, too. I think he would.
My and am sure many others thoughts too.
I worry about Vad getting hurt if he starts this year. He may have all the tools but he needs to bulk up some, so that he can take the hits.
The more accurate assumption is that a QB (or any player for that matter) who redshirts is better off for it. In other words, a player is better their RS-SR year than they would have been their SR year had they not redshirted. Take Nesbitt for example - did he really get any better as a player by the few snaps he took his freshman year? Had he waited, we'd have him at QB right now. That's what a RS gets you - 5 years to develop an expiring asset as opposed to 4.
If he gives us the best chance to win this year he should start. Otherwise he needs to get in line and spend this year learning the plays and working on the fundamentals of the offense so he has those down pat.
redshirt's can lead to rs-jr's leaving to NFL or etc.
All of these guys have actually played a down of college football. Vad, based on my superior talent evaluation abilities :cool:, looks somewhere less than Shawn Jones / Joe Hamilton but above every other QB we've had because everyone else has sucked as a QB talent.
I'm impressed that CPJ used "light years" in the proper distance context.
But not option QBs on option teams.
I'm sorry but I have a huge issue with you saying George Godsey "sucked" as a QB