- Joined
- Mar 28, 2011
- Messages
- 39,314
You don’t think we’re gonna score any points?I like what you're putting down
You don’t think we’re gonna score any points?I like what you're putting down
I was a bit wondering confused by that and thought it was me.I have no idea how wondering got in that sentence.
That’s what I want to hear. Hope their team is doing the same.I’ve looked at a couple of Ole Miss boards and most of them are biting at the bit to play Bama … our game is not even on their radar.
Tulane was wondering playing its backup qb.
I was wondering wondering wondering why he typed it too.I was a bit wondering confused by that and thought it was me.
Horseshit he isn't. Ole Miss fixing to get dat azzzzzz kickedI don’t think Thacker is good enough to prevent what’s coming. We should have flushed his ass last year.
I hope you’re right. But as usual, you probably aren’t.Horseshit he isn't. Ole Miss fixing to get dat azzzzzz kicked
I cannot figure this. Why, of all the coaches who got canned, did we keep hold of him? It made no sense then and it really makes no sense now. Isn't Sherrer listed as co-DC? Problem is Sherrer's LB group has not exactly been a shining star either. Though Oliver is a player! I like how he attacks the ball and arrives with a nasty demeanor.I don’t think Thacker is good enough to prevent what’s coming. We should have flushed his ass last year.
I don’t think Thacker is good enough to prevent what’s coming. We should have flushed his ass last year.
It wasn't like the O, but the D had its share of transfers. Kelly (DL - USF), Reuben (DL - Clem), White (LB - TAMU), Oliver (LB - MN), Moala (LB - ND/ID), Dean ( LB - Rut), Brown (S - MSU), and Daniels (CB - K St). The O retained more of its 2-deep than the D did. Losing Thomas, Eley, and White really, really hurt that front 7.I can’t decide if Thacker was given a chance to see what he could do under a different coach or if he was retained as a sacrificial lamb if the season took a downturn.
The offense is making him look bad. The improvement on that side of the ball is obvious. The D didn’t have the influx of transfers, so that doesn’t help.
At the very least need to cut the LB group a little bit of slack. We don't lose guys like Thomas and Eley without taking a big step back (is also why half those transfers are LB). The thing to see is if that group improves over the season.It wasn't like the O, but the D had its share of transfers. Kelly (DL - USF), Reuben (DL - Clem), White (LB - TAMU), Oliver (LB - MN), Moala (LB - ND/ID), Dean ( LB - Rut), Brown (S - MSU), and Daniels (CB - K St). The O retained more of its 2-deep than the D did. Losing Thomas, Eley, and White really, really hurt that front 7.
Agreed. I thought Oliver, especially, played well and he did grade out pretty high.At the very least need to cut the LB group a little bit of slack. We don't lose guys like Thomas and Eley without taking a big step back (is also why half those transfers are LB). The thing to see is if that group improves over the season.
NCAAF - Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets vs Ole Miss Rebels | Odds Shark
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets vs Ole Miss Rebels Odds - Saturday September 16 2023. Live betting odds and lines, betting trends, against the spread and over/under trends, injury reports and matchup stats for bettors.www.oddsshark.com
Line moves toward Tech to 20.5.
3 touchdown underdog. Ouch.