I get the talent part. But with maturity and adding new players, We can go from a 60 FPI this year to a 30 FPI next year. There’s no limit on that was my point.
Ok , i understand your point and that's where we disagree.
sure, a non GT team with rising talent,growing maturity AND decent coaching could rise from 60th to 30th in a single season.
Collins and our staff would simply screw it up and prevent that from happening.
since Collins and staff are relatively new to P5 one would hope their skills are improving. They aren't.they have no teacher
I don't think our performance rank can improve as fast as you think it can. I think it's ok to agree to disagree
going from 90 to 60 is easier than 60 to 30.
.
using the ratio metric n0minally, improving by our current improvement average .07 would take abt 7 years to improve by .47 to reach a total of 1.0.
at 1.0 a 35th talent level with average coaching and average maturity would come out 35th in performance.
even if we allow a 50% error rate, it's still 3.5 more years to become middle of pack at 35th. and a lot can go wrong in the meantime.
@cyptomcat
No i didn't move any goalposts
my position has been that we have crappy coaching from the get go.
clearly this methodology is more notional than precise
hope you can now see that this metric supports that assertion and what it is that we may disagree about.
If GT finishes in the top 25 next year,then i will have been proven wrong.