Summers gone

SGA_Jacket said:
Are you kidding me? 100% won by the defense (Funny how PJ is the HC, yet people like you don't give him any credit for the D playing well)? Sure, we had 2 INT TD's and the D was a BIG reason we won but the offense played a role too. We had 353 yards of offense at 5.8 yards per play against the #1 defense in the country. We only scored 1 TD but we held the ball for 35 minutes, sustained drives and if you didn't know, kickers can't kick field goals unless they are in range and most of the time it's because the offense is moving the ball. Did I mention they were the best defense in the nation?

You really are a special kind of stupid.
Click to expand...

let's see...

We won 28-6 and our defense single-handedly scored 14 pts.

OK, so maybe the D was 90% of the reason. And no, I don't give the Genius credit for the Defense - that goes to Roof, the DC who's calling the plays.

You keep swinging off Johnson's nutsack though. I'm sure he likes it.
 
RamblinWreck92 said:
let's see...



We won 28-6 and our defense single-handedly scored 14 pts.



OK, so maybe the D was 90% of the reason. And no, I don't give the Genius credit for the Defense - that goes to Roof, the DC who's calling the plays.



You keep swinging off Johnson's nutsack though. I'm sure he likes it.
Click to expand...


So did this retarded cunt ever post his list of candidates?
 
coit said:
That is what I am talking about. Also losing Gotsis in the UNC game to that marginal targeting call.
Click to expand...

I completely, totally agree that the injury bug has hit us disproportionately and they are the very definition of "bad breaks".

But going up the middle 2 times against Puke late and getting stuffed is shitty play-calling, not a bad break. Doing the same crap with JT vs UNC inside the 5 is shitty playcalling, not a bad break.

Losing Gotsis to the Cadavers sucked too but hell's bells - it's UVA. We should have the talent to step up and beat those assholes with our 2nd string. Same goes for Puke.

And at some point, the guys who are taking the place of injured players need to show a bit of progress, no?
 
coit said:
Perhaps we should have '92 give us a short list of his hand picked coaches to replace CPJ?
Click to expand...

Why? He's going nowhere, thanks to another asinine decision to extend a coach. See "Blewitt, Paul" for another example.

You should be banned for talking about firing the HC.
 
RamblinWreck92 said:
Look - it's the head Sack Swinger! You're always full of insults but never fact.

Candidates for what?
Click to expand...


For who you want instead of Johnson. Your bizarre idea that I'm somehow a Paul Johnson cheerleader combined with the fact that you note my penchant for insults when there are very, very few people on here that I insult makes me wonder if we just found jacketup's alt.
 
RamblinWreck92 said:
Why? He's going nowhere, thanks to another asinine decision to extend a coach. See "Blewitt, Paul" for another example.



You should be banned for talking about firing the HC.
Click to expand...


Use your imagination then. You seem to have no other issues with fantasy interfering with fact, so pretend that Johnson is being fired at season's end or today or whatever - who do you want to replace him?
 
SGA_Jacket said:
Referees overturning a call on the field isn't a "break". It was a play made by our guys. You really hate to give ANY credit at all to PJ. He certainly deserves criticism but öööö dude. Have a little perspective.
Click to expand...

Refs overturning a questionable call is absolutely a good break...and one we shouldn't have even needed given that we were curb-stomping those stupid Southern rednecks most of the game.

I give credit to PJ for telling Lance Austin to pick up that blocked FG against Free Shoes and run it b...oh wait, he was waving him off. :rotfl: Thankfully, Austin decided to make a play anyway.

You saying that he "certainly deserves criticism" flies in the face of what most of the STers here seem to think. The Kool Aid is sweet and flows freely here. Anyone who dares point out CPJ's mistakes is met with personal insults. There are few exceptions like coit, who will stick to the topic of football, but most of the STers I read absolutely hate any criticism of the guy.

What I don't understand is why some idiots still equate criticism of CPJ with a desire to have loser Gailey back? That's the lamest of comebacks.
 
RamblinWreck92 said:
let's see...

We won 28-6 and our defense single-handedly scored 14 pts.

OK, so maybe the D was 90% of the reason. And no, I don't give the Genius credit for the Defense - that goes to Roof, the DC who's calling the plays.

You keep swinging off Johnson's nutsack though. I'm sure he likes it.
Click to expand...

So you still won't address the fact that we averaged 5.8 yards per play against the #1 defense in the nation (impressive), got 16 first downs (which helps you sustain drives aka moving the ball), and got our kicker into range four times? But our offense sucked that day, right?

You're a öööö moron. Just because I give PJ credit where it's due means I'm a nut sack swinger? Did you miss the part where I mentioned he deserves criticism and we COULD do better coaching wise than PJ?
 
RamblinWreck92 said:
You saying that he "certainly deserves criticism" flies in the face of what most of the STers here seem to think. The Kool Aid is sweet and flows freely here. Anyone who dares point out CPJ's mistakes is met with personal insults. There are few exceptions like coit, who will stick to the topic of football, but most of the STers I read absolutely hate any criticism of the guy.
Click to expand...
So we've established that part of the problem is that you don't read much ST and you've developed this persecution complex outside of what's actually said on the board.
 
The Jacket said:
For who you want instead of Johnson. Your bizarre idea that I'm somehow a Paul Johnson cheerleader combined with the fact that you note my penchant for insults when there are very, very few people on here that I insult makes me wonder if we just found jacketup's alt.
Click to expand...

You do understand that...when someone makes a criticism of Topic A and gets a response that consists of "You suck"...that in reality, the person who typed the response is an ignorant jackass, incapable of having a reasonable debate, right?

Go ahead and call me a "öööööö" or "öööööööööö" or some more of your awesome, hilarious comebacks. You're so awesome and funny and well-respected for that!

Re: Candidates - I'd have to see a list of who's out there. I'm guessing there are plenty of guys who would love to be paid $2 million + to win 3 games though.

That's another funny "comeback" I see here too - "You can't think of a candidate, which means CPJ is the BEST!"

Laughably, pathetically stupid.
 
The Jacket said:
So we've established that part of the problem is that you don't read much ST and you've developed this persecution complex outside of what's actually said on the board.
Click to expand...

Who's "we"?

And no, I don't live on ST. I have found it to be more open and accepting of CPJ criticism than The Hive, which would have banned me by now for daring to question The Genius.

Sorry, I generally have better things to do on NY Eve than sit on my laptop, posting on an internet message board. I did watch the whole game though. :biggthumpup:
 
RamblinWreck92 said:
I'm busted for being out socializing on NY Eve and watching the game with lots of other people rather than hunched over my laptop at home posting messages on an internet forum board.

you win! :bowrofl:
Click to expand...

How was your Holloween though?

12191760_10101462993032493_3167828755365899100_n.jpg
 
SGA_Jacket said:
So you still won't address the fact that we averaged 5.8 yards per play against the #1 defense in the nation (impressive), got 16 first downs (which helps you sustain drives aka moving the ball), and got our kicker into range four times? But our offense sucked that day, right?

You're a öööö moron. Just because I give PJ credit where it's due means I'm a nut sack swinger? Did you miss the part where I mentioned he deserves criticism and we COULD do better coaching wise than PJ?
Click to expand...

OK, 75%. :lol::lol:

Keep up the witty insults. They're really helping you. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
 
RamblinWreck92 said:
You do understand that...when someone makes a criticism of Topic A and gets a response that consists of "You suck"...that in reality, the person who typed the response is an ignorant jackass, incapable of having a reasonable debate, right?



Go ahead and call me a "öööööö" or "öööööööööö" or some more of your awesome, hilarious comebacks. You're so awesome and funny and well-respected for that!



Re: Candidates - I'd have to see a list of who's out there. I'm guessing there are plenty of guys who would love to be paid $2 million + to win 3 games though.



That's another funny "comeback" I see here too - "You can't think of a candidate, which means CPJ is the BEST!"



Laughably, pathetically stupid.
Click to expand...


Why would I need to bother with "comebacks" when you're so obsessed with the idea that you're being persecuted you type them out for me in some sort of attempt at a preemptive defense mechanism.

Actually, aside from the fact that I want to know who you want instead, I wanted to confirm that you do actually want him gone.

There's really nothing else to say to you since I have that confirmation. Paul Johnson deserves criticism for a number of things this year, but wanting to fire him while we're in the middle of a bad year rife with bad luck to go along with the bad calls and decisions, following an 11-3 year with a win over Georgia and trips to the ACCCG and the Orange Bowl? It's a waste of time. We're having a bad year and you want blood to make you feel better about it - your concern is not with the football program, it's with your anger over the season. I've got plenty of time to talk about football, but none to talk about your feelings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top