Transfer Portal Tracker

JJacket said:
Haynes King made WR's look good because DB's had to respect his running ability.

You guys need to settle TF down with this end of the world stuff. The WR's we have look damn good, Canion and Stockton and the additions have solid stats. The TE room also looks damn good.

And Canion is 6'4" and 215 lbs
Click to expand...
If Canion was that good, he would have been on the field more this year
 
TechRush said:
Meh, receivers are replaceable. Singleton was mostly hype anyway. Rutherford at least could make the catch in key moments, but he is replaceable. Thank you for your service to the Tech cause Malik, but I think you are making a pour decision. Like a wise man once said, it is what it is
Click to expand...
It’s never as good or as bad as it seems
 
Flywheel said:
1. Singleton didn't play defense and he was the point being discussed.
2. 34th, not 14th, on D. 54th on O.

College Football Stats - College FB Team Opponent Third Down Conversion Percentage | TeamRankings.com

College Football opponent third down conversion percentage, by team.
www.teamrankings.com www.teamrankings.com
Click to expand...
Oops. I misunderstood the post you were replying to.

But I’m sticking to my guns on our 3rd down defense

IMG_1277.png
 
musicalBuzz said:
It’s also plausible that Malik is looking at what the new guys are getting — for instance, a certain new HS kid that’s never played a down in CFB.

For the sake of an example let’s say Malik is getting $100k. And he’s looking at what he’s brought to the team in real action. He asks the staff for more — because that’s what every player — and coach — does: They do their job under that agreement, then they ask for more because they feel “undervalued” now.. for doing their job. Did Coach Key not just do this and what was his increase in both percentage and raw value?

As many of us experienced once you’ve set your value with a company/organization it’s very hard to just be paid more. So- you move to a different company. And that’s what Malik is doing.

CFB is the same thing we work through, except for exponentially more dollars, with much higher inflated egos in play, and in a system that has no particular accountability.
Click to expand...
I think there is some truth to this.
 
musicalBuzz said:
It’s also plausible that Malik is looking at what the new guys are getting — for instance, a certain new HS kid that’s never played a down in CFB.

For the sake of an example let’s say Malik is getting $100k. And he’s looking at what he’s brought to the team in real action. He asks the staff for more — because that’s what every player — and coach — does: They do their job under that agreement, then they ask for more because they feel “undervalued” now.. for doing their job. Did Coach Key not just do this and what was his increase in both percentage and raw value?

As many of us experienced once you’ve set your value with a company/organization it’s very hard to just be paid more. So- you move to a different company. And that’s what Malik is doing.

CFB is the same thing we work through, except for exponentially more dollars, with much higher inflated egos in play, and in a system that has no particular accountability.
Click to expand...
Not sure if I'm over sharing. Mods can delete if so. Malik asked Brent for $1m. We used that to convince philo to be our program qb going forward and retain Jordan van de berg (all conference DT).

Plus - Brent really likes the young receivers in Canion, Bailey Stockton, etc.

The fiu guys are good. Rivers was named 3rd team all American and finished in the top 10 in every single major receiving statistic.
 
BainbridgeJacket said:
Not sure if I'm over sharing. Mods can delete if so. Malik asked Brent for $1m. We used that to convince philo to be our program qb going forward and retain Jordan van de berg (all conference DT).

Plus - Brent really likes the young receivers in Canion, Bailey Stockton, etc.

The fiu guys are good. Rivers was named 3rd team all American and finished in the top 10 in every single major receiving statistic.
Click to expand...
I don't see Malik being delusional enough to ask for $1 million. He will get that nowhere.
 
BainbridgeJacket said:
Not sure if I'm over sharing. Mods can delete if so. Malik asked Brent for $1m. We used that to convince philo to be our program qb going forward and retain Jordan van de berg (all conference DT).

Plus - Brent really likes the young receivers in Canion, Bailey Stockton, etc.

The fiu guys are good. Rivers was named 3rd team all American and finished in the top 10 in every single major receiving statistic.
Click to expand...
Malik needs to go retake Econ 1101 and pay attention to supply and demand if he thinks Philo and Van den Berg getting paid means he gets the same things. Receivers grow on trees as evidenced by how we have done in the portal. QBs and all conference DTs do not.
 
savbandjacket said:
Malik needs to go retake Econ 1101 and pay attention to supply and demand if he thinks Philo and Van den Berg getting paid means he gets the same things. Receivers grow on trees as evidenced by how we have done in the portal. QBs and all conference DTs do not.
Click to expand...
FWIW, I don't believe he asked for that much.
 
BainbridgeJacket said:
Not sure if I'm over sharing. Mods can delete if so. Malik asked Brent for $1m. We used that to convince philo to be our program qb going forward and retain Jordan van de berg (all conference DT).

Plus - Brent really likes the young receivers in Canion, Bailey Stockton, etc.

The fiu guys are good. Rivers was named 3rd team all American and finished in the top 10 in every single major receiving statistic.
Click to expand...
Also - this is why we need players signed to contracts if they are going to negotiate payouts. Imagine the NFL without contracts where every prima donna was free to throw a fit at any time over who is getting paid what.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top