Listen, you can venture down the path of “what if’s” and that’s fine. The reality is, no one knows what will happen until the games are played. The ACC is perceived “weak” because a majority of the league maxes out at 7 wins and loses big OOC games to the B1G, sec, etc. It’s going to be hard for any league to get more than 2 teams in when the 3rd place team finishes 9-3.
The conference thanks to Swafford is built with hoops first and foremost in an era where football is 100% king. You are 1,000% correct there.
FSU, Clemson in 2024 may or may not be Top 10 level next year. People think Clemson is on the “decline” and FSU lost a lot off the 13-1 team. But now ESPN is all of a sudden disrespecting them? After Clemson, FSU, it’s a guessing game.
Miami never meets media expectations, UNC folds starting in late October-early November, and UofL is using the Portal to fill key positions way too much. They didn’t exactly finish the season well either losing to UK, FSU with an 3rd string QB and a depleted USC team full of opt outs. NCSU is a solid program, but has a grand total of 1 season in their history with more than 9 wins (2002 with 11).
Add GT, VT, Pitt to the next tier. GT, VT finally appear to be on the upswing, while Pitt looks to be going the opposite direction.
Duke, Wake, BC, Syracuse are all extremely hard to figure out from one year to the next. UVA just sucks. Period.
Now add in SMU, Stanford and Cal. All 3 have potential to be good programs, with SMU having the $$$ and resources to make the next level jump, now that they are in the ACC.