ClubSeats
Full StingTalk
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2019
- Messages
- 7,108
Usually we are at an angle so we can cross streams.
Usually we are at an angle so we can cross streams.
Not in the Ladies' rooms.Piss troughs are so effective at moving bathroom lines. Don’t hate.
I’ve seen a lady back up to one. Seemed pretty efficient.Not in the Ladies' rooms.
Not in the Ladies' rooms.
Did Cal and Stanford jump too soon?
Did Cal and Stanford jump too soon?
Now do the Atlantic Coast Conference.I think PAC# doesn’t make sense as a name for that conference. It should be rePAC or unPAC.
Now do the Atlantic Coast Conference.
KFC used to mean "Kentucky Fried Chicken" now it just means KFC.I said for a while that since Atlantic doesn’t make sense, the conference should be rebranded as the Big Baller Conference.
The villain in all of this is ESPN.
:rollseyes:The villain in all of this is ESPN.
Obviously, Clemson and FSU have acted stupidly with all of this. Suing the conference was never going to work. They have done a great deal of PR and brand damage to themselves and the conference they are bound to.
But ööööing ESPN/ABC/Disney is who people really need to be blaming. They've created this lopsided playing field and have no qualms about continuing it. That corporate behemoth has become a scourge to everything it touches.
B1G could have easily taken both Cal, Stanford last summer for pennies on the dollar and are perfect fits academically but didn’t for a reason…..They are not brands that really do anything for them from a football perspective. While Cal looks like a pretty good team this year, the attendance isn’t good. Stanford games are beyond embarrassing from an attendance standpoint.No. They’re obviously angling for an eventual Big Ten membership. Along with several other ACC schools.
Don’t forget Swofford. He helped push it through so that his son’s media company would benefit.The villain in all of this is ESPN.
Obviously, Clemson and FSU have acted stupidly with all of this. Suing the conference was never going to work. They have done a great deal of PR and brand damage to themselves and the conference they are bound to.
But ööööing ESPN/ABC/Disney is who people really need to be blaming. They've created this lopsided playing field and have no qualms about continuing it. That corporate behemoth has become a scourge to everything it touches.
Placing blame on a reactionary stupid contract with an insane amount of time between contracts isn’t at all the fault of ABC/ESPN. That solely is 100% the ACC leadership at the time (Swafford) fault. The ACC sold themselves out for a stupid ACC Network.The villain in all of this is ESPN.
Obviously, Clemson and FSU have acted stupidly with all of this. Suing the conference was never going to work. They have done a great deal of PR and brand damage to themselves and the conference they are bound to.
But ööööing ESPN/ABC/Disney is who people really need to be blaming. They've created this lopsided playing field and have no qualms about continuing it. That corporate behemoth has become a scourge to everything it touches.
Obviously Swafford and the conference leadership has a big share of blame for making a bad deal, but ESPN/ABC/Disney owns the "property". They also own the SEC property. They have effectively favored one to the neglect of the other. They are solely to blame for tilting the playing field and doing nothing to mitigate the imbalance.Placing blame on a reactionary stupid contract with an insane amount of time between contracts isn’t at all the fault of ABC/ESPN. That solely is 100% the ACC leadership at the time (Swafford) fault. The ACC sold themselves out for a stupid ACC Network.
The new B1G and sec contracts will expire before this dinosaur ACC TV deal. So the fact that those 2 leagues will get even more $$$ per school will continue to widen the gap.
Would there be a basis for a fraud claim based on this conflict of interest? I assume Swofford had a fiduciary obligation.Don’t forget Swofford. He helped push it through so that his son’s media company would benefit.
I think this was FSU's thinking going with the lawsuit. Threaten to make people testify under oath about how the deal was done if we can't get out of the GOR and exit fees.Would there be a basis for a fraud claim based on this conflict of interest? I assume Swofford had a fiduciary obligation.