Note that I said "everywhere else, " i.e. other than Tulane. Take a look at his entire career. That said, there is an argument to be made that his record at Tulane could be considered successful given their history and resources. He's not my choice, but I don't think it would be such a terrible/unthinkable hire that many are predicting and we could definitely do (and have done) much worse. If nothing else, he could stabilize the program and make it much more appealing when he retires in 5-7 years. Likely at a decent salary with a limited buyout.