TechPreacher
Flats Noob
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2011
- Messages
- 629
Note that I was one of the last here to give up on Chan, but give up on him I did. And you can play the "what if" game always. What if Chan was on the verge and was about to beat UGA five times? But how many believe that?
While it is impossible to know what could have been, we can definitely deal in what we do know. CCG's recruits beat ugag in '08 and won the ACC in '09.
When you hire someone you decide your criteria for success and a reasonable period to achieve that success. Then you stick with it and do not rationalize for one more year because excuses can always be found year to year that happen to all teams but only affect some.
To me, a reasonable period is enough time to have your own recruits as seniors, with a full year to recruit those seniors. So, basically by the fifth year you should see the measure of what you can expect.
... unless your reasonable period is unreasonable. I don't know about every coaching situation in the history of college football, but for Tech's situation, the fifth year test is unreasonable. To judge CPJ on his first or even second recruiting class is, at best, incomplete, because his best class so far looks to be the '12 class. We have been saying this whole time, "Wait til he gets his players on the field." Well, if he is fired after year 5 or year 6, his players will be on the field in '14 and '15, but he won't be. Deja vu all over again.