andrew
Bobby Bonilla's Financial Planner
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2010
- Messages
- 27,366
No it's not.
In his first two years CPJ won an ACC Championship, beat Georgia, and went to a Peach Bowl and a BCS Bowl. Gailey never did any of that in 7 seasons. CPJ clearly accomplished more in his first two years than Gailey accomplished in 7. It's really not close.
Now years 3 and 4 have been a little rough, but not significantly different than what we had under Gailey.
08: CPJ >> Gailey
09: CPJ >> Gailey
10: CPJ < Gailey
11: CPJ = Gailey
12: ?
If we get four more years averaging out pretty much like the last four, I'll be a happy camper, and so should anyone else who's not a complete douchebag.
To me it boils down to two things: he beat U[sic]GA and he won the ACC. Those are two big things, definitely, but do those two things alone outweigh what Gailey did in seven years in terms of total accomplishments? I would lean towards "no", but it is at least close, it's not "clearly so far" ahead.
How is getting to the Orange Bowl different than winning the ACC? You can't have one without the other, so I don't see the reasoning behind listing it twice. Obviously if we had won it that would be different.
Similarly, I don't see going to the Peach Bowl as being a huge accomplishment that CPJ has over Gailey. Peach Bowl was the #3 ACC bowl. We went to the Gator Bowl, which was #2 ACC at the time. Obviously the Peach Bowl is a better experience for GT fans, but it's not like the coaches pick where we go and Gailey turned down the Peach Bowl.
If anything, Peach Bowl should be a mark in Radakovich's favor over Braine, because I'm sure ADs have a lot more to do with bowl politics than head coaches.