Re: Coach O\'Leary sighting
Originally posted by ncjacket:
Okay MsTA you did finally answer one of my questions. If the team looks good on the field you'll be a Chan fan right?
So you're telling me that when you hire a new employee you don't support him/her until they do something good? That's what you said about coaches. So to follow through with my earlier questions I'll assume then that you were anti-Ross until he started to win. You already said you didn't like Curry. So we're closing in here. You like who you like no matter what the product on the field. At least that's my perception of what you've said.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">NCJ: I did answer all these questionS - go back and read. I'll let you find it because IT'S THERE! I even answered these SAME QUESTIONS MONTHS AGO AND HERE WE GO AGAIN! Reading is only good for those who post their answers and not the rebuttals - is that it?
You support until you see things that are not happening, not being done, not coming out right, not producing, not relating, not functioning, not getting it - kind of like coaching! As time progresses forward the writing is on the wall that you have someone good for the job and the company, or you don't. The daily evals and those that come in are part of the process for your continued employment! This is not hard to fathom.
As time passes and you see things I documented above - support wanes, maybe to the point depending on the situation of being in a trial mode and having to meet objectives to continue on. If support is to continue - you have to continue doing the right things in your position to keep it - simple isn't it? It stands for my job, my CFO, CDO, Acct Mgr - you name it.
Employees are constantly evaluated by their managers, supervisors, direct reports - 90 days, a year. That's what I know and do. Now, if those evals don't come out like the standards of performance as set forth by the company for any particular job function - you either going to get another opportunity based on some things that were good and some that were not; or, you were so incapable you're gone. Isn't that the same here - Chan has another year and we will all see.
But that one year passed has him on the ropes because his evaluation by me was not outstanding. He has to get better and produce a better product and management of his dept.
BOR missed it too! My, my, my!
