JJacket
Gettysburg. Wow.
- Joined
- May 20, 2003
- Messages
- 90,503
Your dumbNo you.
Your dumbNo you.
So you want to forfeit cause we can't win?
You’re mammaYour dumb
So, you have unreasonable expectations in year 3. I mean, just say that.This coach signed a contract worth more than any GT football predecessor and he did so under the agreement that he would establish the team as a nationally relevant football brand and return the program to being nationally competitive. I don’t care what other coaches make, I am talking about what this coach signed up to do.
We've had a lot of years where the chances are not good and we have won. You just seem awfully defeatist about it. Probably is only a few teams in CFB who can beat UGAg right now, if that. Somehow, though, we have fonts on here that will use that game as a measure of our season.Did I say anything about not playing or forfeiting the game? No I did not. But, the chances of beating that team with this team are not good.
Can't believe we are midway through year 3 and we aren't a national brand yet.So, you have unreasonable expectations in year 3. I mean, just say that.
So, you have unreasonable expectations in year 3. I mean, just say that.
Set the bar so low you’ll never be disappointed. I mean, just say that.So, you have unreasonable expectations in year 3. I mean, just say that.
So, you have unreasonable expectations in year 3. I mean, just say that.
Beating a directional Illinois team is an unrealistic expectation?So, you have unreasonable expectations in year 3. I mean, just say that.
Like it or not, we were a national brand when Johnson was the coach. We were the team that ran the funny old-timey offense. We were a national brand under Gailey, as the school with Calvin Johnson, the cheat-code of wide receivers. We had a brand under O'Leary. Right now, we are, undoubtedly, the lowest point I can ever remember.Can't believe we are midway through year 3 and we aren't a national brand yet.
I'll say this. UGAg's defense seems legit, but until it's proven otherwise, my opinion is the SEC is down as a whole this year and they just keep getting the benefit of the doubt because everybody thinks they are all good. Florida sucks, LSU sucks, USCe sucks, Vandy still sucks, Kentucky only looks good because they were undefeated over other "SEC" teams but they are all down too. Everybody thought Arkansas was good but they suck again. Auburn almost and probably should have lost to GA State. Missouri sucks. They only lost to Kentucky by a TD and also lost to Boston College by a TD. They got the crap beat out of them by Tennessee, same Tennessee that lost to Pitt. UGAg may very well be the best team in the SEC this year but they do not have an offense. They barely beat Clemson by a pick 6. Clemson has barely eeked by in all of their wins so far other than SC State. All these SEC teams keep getting the benefit of the doubt because "SEC." Bama and UGAg are good teams. I think the rest are all mediocre at best.Really? Have you been watching our team and their team?
This guy ain’t wrong.Like it or not, we were a national brand when Johnson was the coach. We were the team that ran the funny old-timey offense. We were a national brand under Gailey, as the school with Calvin Johnson, the cheat-code of wide receivers. We had a brand under O'Leary. Right now, we are, undoubtedly, the lowest point I can ever remember.
öööö, Collins has to win the next two games to tie Bill ööööing Lewis' record. But Lewis didn't have to face the might of teams like the Citadel or Temple or Northern Illinois University. Or last year's winless against everyone else Syracuse team. so it all makes sense.
It is unreasonable to set a bowl as the low-point for your expectations - which is what some fonts have done. I’d say given what we were willing to pay a coach, finding a great recruiter who is willing to adjust and learn in order to get better and improve the team and the results is exceeding the reasonable expectations.A bowl in season 3 is not an unreasonable expectation. Perhaps you could argue it is on the high side of expectations, given the state of the team when CPJ left, but definitely not unreasonable.
Our brand was as the laughing stock of college football towards the end of CPJ’s tenure. Under Gailey, our brand was mediocre 7-win seasons every year. I’d say we haven’t had a real National brand since O’Leary. Even then, it wasn’t the greatest.Like it or not, we were a national brand when Johnson was the coach. We were the team that ran the funny old-timey offense. We were a national brand under Gailey, as the school with Calvin Johnson, the cheat-code of wide receivers. We had a brand under O'Leary. Right now, we are, undoubtedly, the lowest point I can ever remember.
öööö, Collins has to win the next two games to tie Bill ööööing Lewis' record. But Lewis didn't have to face the might of teams like the Citadel or Temple or Northern Illinois University. Or last year's winless against everyone else Syracuse team. so it all makes sense.
That’s not what he said was his expectation. Don’t change the argument.Beating a directional Illinois team is an unrealistic expectation?
I'll say this. UGAg's defense seems legit, but until it's proven otherwise, my opinion is the SEC is down as a whole this year and they just keep getting the benefit of the doubt because everybody thinks they are all good. Florida sucks, LSU sucks, USCe sucks, Vandy still sucks, Kentucky only looks good because they were undefeated over other "SEC" teams but they are all down too. Everybody thought Arkansas was good but they suck again. Auburn almost and probably should have lost to GA State. Missouri sucks. They only lost to Kentucky by a TD and also lost to Boston College by a TD. They got the crap beat out of them by Tennessee, same Tennessee that lost to Pitt. UGAg may very well be the best team in the SEC this year but they do not have an offense. They barely beat Clemson by a pick 6. Clemson has barely eeked by in all of their wins so far other than SC State. All these SEC teams keep getting the benefit of the doubt because "SEC." Bama and UGAg are good teams. I think the rest are all mediocre at best.
I'm reading a lot of good posts in this thread. Good, honest assessments - don't agree with all of them but most everybody is avoiding hyperbole in either direction.
So here's a follow up question: if we win three more and go to a bowl, would you or would you not approve of the season?
Our remaining games:
@Virginia.
Virginia Tech
@Miami
Boston College
@Notre Dame
dwags
Speaking for myself, I would call three more wins (regular season) very good progress. Get to a bowl and win for a 7th would be very, very good.
What are my expectations? Do you know? You must to make that kind of statement.Set the bar so low you’ll never be disappointed. I mean, just say that.
What are my expectations? Do you know? You must to make that kind of statement.